Sets with Cardinality Constraints in Satisfiability Modulo Theories
Boolean Algebra with Presburger Arithmetic (BAPA) is a decidable logic that can express constraints on sets of elements and their cardinalities. Problems from verification of complex properties of software often contain fragments that belong to quantifier-free BAPA (QFBAPA). In contrast to many other NP-complete problems (such as quantifier-free first-order logic or linear arithmetic), the applications of QFBAPA to a broader set of problems has so far been hindered by the lack of an efficient implementation that can be used alongside other efficient decision procedures. We overcome these limitations by extending the efficient SMT solver Z3 with the ability to reason about cardinality (QFBAPA) constraints. Our implementation uses the DPLL(T) mechanism of Z3 to reason about the top-level propositional structure of a QFBAPA formula, improving the efficiency compared to previous implementations. Moreover, we present a new algorithm for automatically decomposing QFBAPA formulas. Our algorithm alleviates the exponential explosion of considering all Venn regions, significantly improving the tractability of formulas with many set variables. Because it is implemented as a theory plugin, our implementation enables Z3 to prove formulas that use QFBAPA constructs with constructs from other theories that Z3 supports, as well as with quantifiers. We have applied our implementation to the verification of functional programs; we show it can automatically prove formulas that no automated approach was reported to be able to prove before.
KeywordsDecision Procedure Integer Variable Functional Program Satisfiability Modulo Theory Cardinality Constraint
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Dewar, R.K.: Programming by refinement, as exemplified by the SETL representation sublanguage. ACM TOPLAS (July 1979)Google Scholar
- 4.Gottlob, G., Greco, G., Marnette, B.: HyperConsistency width for constraint satisfaction: Algorithms and complexity results. In: Lipshteyn, M., Levit, V.E., McConnell, R.M. (eds.) Graph Theory, Computational Intelligence and Thought. LNCS, vol. 5420, pp. 87–99. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Gulwani, S., Lev-Ami, T., Sagiv, M.: A combination framework for tracking partition sizes. In: POPL, pp. 239–251 (2009)Google Scholar
- 7.Kuncak, V.: Modular Data Structure Verification. Ph.D. thesis, EECS Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (February 2007)Google Scholar
- 8.Kuncak, V., Nguyen, H.H., Rinard, M.: Deciding Boolean Algebra with Presburger Arithmetic. J. of Automated Reasoning (2006)Google Scholar
- 12.Liang, S.: The Java Native Interface: Programmer’s Guide and Specification. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1999)Google Scholar
- 16.Suter, P., Dotta, M., Kuncak, V.: Decision procedures for algebraic data types with abstractions. In: POPL (2010)Google Scholar
- 20.Zee, K., Kuncak, V., Rinard, M.: Full functional verification of linked data structures. In: PLDI, pp. 349–361 (2008)Google Scholar
- 21.Zee, K., Kuncak, V., Rinard, M.: An integrated proof language for imperative programs. In: PLDI, pp. 338–351 (2009)Google Scholar