Nonverbal Expressions of Turn Management in TV Interviews: A Cross-Cultural Study between Greek and Icelandic
In this paper we discuss a cross-cultural analysis of non-verbal expressions (gestures, facial expressions, body posture) that have a turn managing function in the flow of interaction. The study was carried out by analyzing and comparing the features of interest in two samples of institutional interaction, namely face-to-face political interviews, in Greek and Icelandic respectively. The non-verbal behavior of the participants in both interviews was annotated following the same annotation process. The attested turn management instances were compared in order to find similarities and differences in terms of frequency and modality preference.
Keywordsturn management non-verbal expressions institutional interaction
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.McNeill, D.: Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal About Thought. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1992)Google Scholar
- 3.Efron, D.: Gesture, Race and Culture. Mouton, The Hague (/1941/1972)Google Scholar
- 4.Kendon, A.: Geography of gesture. Semiotica 37(1/2), 129–163 (1981a)Google Scholar
- 8.Allwood, J., Cerrato, L., Jokinen, K., Navarretta, C., Paggio, P.: The MUMIN Coding Scheme for the Annotation of Feedback, Turn Management and Sequencing Phenomena. Multimodal Corpora for Modeling Human Multimodal Behaviour. Journal on Language Resources and Evaluation 41(3-4), 273–287 (2007)Google Scholar
- 10.Ford, C.E., Thompson, S.A.: Interactional Units in Conversation: Syntactic, Intonational, and Pragmatic Resources for the Management of Turns. In: Ochs, E., Schegloff, E.A., Thompson, S.A. (eds.) Interaction and Grammar, pp. 134–184. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Heritage, J.: Conversation Analysis and Institutional Talk. In: Sanders, R., Fitch, K. (eds.) Handbook of Language and Social Interaction, pp. 103–146. Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey (2005)Google Scholar