Computational Fluid Dynamics 2010 pp 613-619 | Cite as
A Two-Dimensional Embedded-Boundary Method for Convection Problems with Moving Boundaries
Abstract
A 2D embedded-boundary algorithm for convection problems is presented. A moving body of arbitrary boundary shape is immersed in a Cartesian finite-volume grid, which is fixed in space. The boundary surface is reconstructed in such a way that only certain fluxes in the immediate neighbourhood indirectly accommodate effects of the boundary conditions valid on the moving body. Over the majority of the domain, where these boundary conditions have “no” effect, the fluxes are computed using standard schemes. Examples are given to validate the method.
Keywords
Boundary Point Convection Problem Fixed Grid MUSCL Scheme Embed BoundaryNotes
Acknowledgements
The first author’s research is funded by the Delft Centre for Computational Science & Engineering (DCSE), TU Delft.
References
- 1.Hassen, Y., Koren, B.: Finite-volume discretizations and immersed boundaries. In: Koren, B., Vuik, C. (eds.) Advanced Computational Methods in Science and Engineering, Lecturer Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, vol. 71, pp. 229–268. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Google Scholar
- 2.Hassen, Y., Koren, B.: A two-dimensional embedded-boundary method for convection problems with moving boundaries. Report MAC-1003, CWI, Amsterdam (2010)Google Scholar
- 3.Koren, B.: A robust upwind finite-volume method for advection, diffusion and source terms. In: Vreugdenhil, C.B., Koren, B. (eds.) Numerical Methods for Advection-Diffusion Problems, Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics, vol. 45, pp. 117–138. Vieweg, Braunschweig (1993)Google Scholar
- 4.van Leer, B.: Upwind-difference methods for aerodynamic problems governed by the Euler equations. In: Engquist, B.E., Osher, S., Somerville, R.C.J. (eds.) Large-Scale Computations in Fluid Mechanics, Lectures in Applied Maths, vol. 22.2, pp. 327–336. Am. Math. Soc., Providence, RI (1985)Google Scholar
- 5.Mittal, R., Iaccarino, G.: Immersed boundary methods. Ann. Rev. Fl. Mech. 37, 239–261 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar