Stackelberg Strategies for Network Design Games

  • Angelo Fanelli
  • Michele Flammini
  • Luca Moscardelli
Conference paper

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-17572-5_18

Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6484)
Cite this paper as:
Fanelli A., Flammini M., Moscardelli L. (2010) Stackelberg Strategies for Network Design Games. In: Saberi A. (eds) Internet and Network Economics. WINE 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6484. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg


We consider the Network Design game introduced by Anshelevich et al. [1] in which n source-destination pairs must be connected by n respective players equally sharing the cost of the used links. By considering the classical Open image in new window social function corresponding to the total network cost, it is well known that the price of anarchy for this class of games may be as large as n. One approach for reducing this bound is that of resorting on the Stackelberg model in which for a subset of \(\lfloor \alpha n \rfloor\) coordinated players, with 0 ≤ α ≤ 1, communication paths inducing better equilibria are fixed. In this paper we show the effectiveness of Stackelberg strategies by providing optimal and nearly optimal bounds on the performance achievable by such strategies. In particular, differently from previous works, we are also able to provide Stackelberg strategies computable in polynomial time and lowering the price of anarchy from n to \(2 \left( \frac 1 \alpha + 1 \right)\). Most of the results are extended to the social function Open image in new window, in which the maximum player cost is considered.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Angelo Fanelli
    • 1
  • Michele Flammini
    • 2
  • Luca Moscardelli
    • 3
  1. 1.Division of Mathematical Sciences, School of Physical and Mathematical SciencesNanyang Technological UniversitySingapore
  2. 2.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of L’AquilaItaly
  3. 3.Department of ScienceUniversity of Chieti-PescaraItaly

Personalised recommendations