Advertisement

State of the Art in Wireless Sensor Networks Operating Systems: A Survey

  • Muhammad Omer Farooq
  • Sadia Aziz
  • Abdul Basit Dogar
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6485)

Abstract

This paper, presents a survey on current state of the art in Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) Operating Systems (OSs). WSN is composed of miniature senor and resource constraint devices. WSN is highly dynamic network because nodes die out due to severe environmental conditions and battery power depletion. Stated characteristics of WSN impose additional challenges on OS design for WSN. Therefore; OS design for WSN deviates from traditional OS design. The purpose of this survey is to point out strengths and weaknesses of contemporary OS for WSNs, keeping in view the requirements of emerging WSNs applications. State of the art, in operating systems for WSNs has been examined in terms of Architecture, Scheduling, Threading Model, Synchronization, Memory Management, and Communication Protocol support. The examination of these features is performed for both real time and non real time operating systems for WSNs. We believe that this survey will help the network designers and programmers to choose the right OS for their network and applications. Moreover, pros and cons of different operating systems will help the researchers to design more robust OSs for WSNs.

Keywords

Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN) Operating System (OS) Embedded Operating Systems 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Levis, P., Madden, S., Polastre, J., Szewczyk, R., Whitehouse, K., Woo, A., Gay, D., Hill, J., Welsh, M., Brewer, E., Culler, D.: Tinyos: An operating system for sensor networks, pp. 115–148 (2005), http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27139-2_7
  2. 2.
    Cooprider, N., Archer, W., Eide, E., Gay, D., Regehr, J.: Efficient memory safety for tinyos. In: 5th international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems. SenSys 2007, pp. 205–218. ACM, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Klues, K., Liang, C.J.M., Paek, J., Musaloiu, R., Levis, P., Terzis, A., Govindan, R.: TOSThread: Thread-safe and Non-Invasive Preemption in TinyOS. In: 7th ACM conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, pp. 127–140 (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bhatti, S., Carlson, J., Dai, H., Deng, J., Rose, J., Sheth, A., Shucker, B., Gruenwald, C., Torgerson, H.R.: Mantis os: an embedded multithreaded operating system for wireless micro sensor platforms. Mob. Netw. Appl. 10(4), 563–579 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dunkels, A., Gronvall, B., Voigt, T.: Contiki - a lightweight and flexible operating system for tiny networked sensors. In: 29th Annual IEEE International Conference on Local Computer Networks, pp. 455–462. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kuorilehto, M., Alho, T., Hannikainen, M., Hamalainen, T.D.: SensorOS: A New Operating System for Time Critical WSN Applications. In: Vassiliadis, S., Bereković, M., Hämäläinen, T.D. (eds.) SAMOS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4599, pp. 431–442. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Han, C.C., Kumar, R., Shea, R., Kohler, E., Srivastava, M.: A Dynamic Operating System for Sensor Nodes. In: 3rd International Conference on Mobile systems, applications and services, pp. 163–176 (June 2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kim, H., Cha, H.: Multithreading Optimization Techniques for Sensor Network Operating Systems. In: 4th European conference on Wireless Sensor Networks, pp. 293–308 (January 2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Eswaran, A., Rowe, A., Rajkumar, R.: Nano-RK: an Energy-aware Resource-centric RTOS for Sensor Networks. In: 26th IEEE International Real Time Systems Symposium, pp. 256–265 (December 2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Reddy, V., Kumar, P., Janakiram, D., Kumar, G.A.: Operating Systems for Wireless Sensor Networks: A Survey. International Journal of Sensor Networks 5(4), 236–255 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Akyildiz, I.F., Su, W., Sankarasubramaniam, Y., Cayirci, E.: Wireless Sensor Networks: a survey. Computer Networks 38(4), 393–422 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Romer, K., Mattern, F.: The design space of wireless sensor networks. IEEE Wireless Communication 11(6), 54–61 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hill, J., Szewczyk, R., Woo, A., Hollar, S., Culler, D., Pister, K.S.J.: System architecture directions for networked sensors. In: Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, pp. 93–104 (2000)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
    Network Protocols- TinyOS documentation Wiki. Web page, http://docs.tinyos.net/index.php/Network_Protocols
  16. 16.
    Lin, K., Levis, P.: Data Discovery and Dissemination with DIP. In: 7th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, pp. 433–444 (2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gay, D., Levis, P., Von Behren, R., Welsh, M., Brewer, E., Culler, D.: The nes C language: A holistic approach to networked embedded systems. In: SIGLAN 2003 (2003)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dwivedi, A.K., Tiwari, M.K., Vyas, O.P.: Operating Systems for Tiny Networked Sensors: A Survey. International Journal of Recent Trends in Engineering 1(2) (May 2009)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Protothreads- Lightweight, Stackless Threads in C, http://www.sics.se/~adam/pt/
  20. 20.
    Tsiftes, N., Eriksson, J., Dunkels, A.: Low-Power Wireless Ipv6 Routing with ContikiRPL. In: ACM/IEEE IPSN (2010)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Winter, T., Thubert, P.: RPL: Ipv6 Routing Protocol for Low Power and Lossy Networks, July 28 (2010) draft-ietf-roll-rpl-11Google Scholar
  22. 22.
  23. 23.
    Von Behren, R., Condit, J., Brewer, E.: Why Events are a Bad Idea (for High Concurrency Servers). In: 9th Workshop on Hot Topic in Operating Systems, HOTOS IX (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Muhammad Omer Farooq
    • 1
  • Sadia Aziz
    • 2
  • Abdul Basit Dogar
    • 3
  1. 1.Transmission Systems Research GroupJacobs University BremenGermany
  2. 2.Computer Engineering DepartmentCASEPakistan
  3. 3.Department of Computer ScienceVirtual University of PakistanLahorePakistan

Personalised recommendations