Implementation and Evaluation of Combined Positioning and Communication

  • Paul Alcock
  • James Brown
  • Utz Roedig
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6511)


A new generation of communication transceivers are able to support Time of Flight (TOF) distance measurements. Transceiver manufacturers envision that communication and positioning features are used separately and one at a time. However, we have demonstrated that such separation is unnecessary and that TOF measurements can be obtained during data communication. Thus, distance measurements required by positioning services can be collected both energy and bandwidth efficiently. In this paper we describe the modification of an existing low power wireless sensor network (WSN) medium access control (MAC) protocol called FrameComm to include collection of distance measurements. We describe the implementation of the modified FrameComm protocol (called FrameCommDM) on a Nanotron DK development kit comprising of an Atmel ATmega128 MCU and a Nanotron NA5TR1 transceiver. The performance of the FrameComm and FrameCommDM implementation on the Nanotron platform is evaluated and compared. It is shown that the collection of distance measurements has no significant impact on communication performance. Furthermore, the difference in energy consumption used to perform the additional ranging tasks of FrameCommDM is examined and quantified.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Patwari, N., Ash, J.N., Kyperountas, S., Hero, A.O., Moses, R.L., Correal, N.S.: Locating the nodes. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 22(4), 54–69 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    IEEE 802.15 WPAN Low Rate Alternative PHY Task Group 4a (TG4a),
  3. 3.
    Nanotron nanoLOC TRX Data Sheet (2007),
  4. 4.
    Benson, J., O’Donovan, T., Roedig, U., Sreenan, C.: Opportunistic Aggregation over Duty Cycled Communications in Wireless Sensor Networks. In: Proceedings of the IPSN Track on Sensor Platform, Tools and Design Methods for Networked Embedded Systems (IPSN2008/SPOTS2008), April 2008, IEEE Computer Society Press, St. Louis (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Correal, N.S., Kyperountas, S., Shi, Q., Welborn, M.: An uwb relative location system. In: IEEE Conference on Ultra Wideband Systems and Technologies, pp. 394–397 (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cheong, P., Oppermann, I.: An Energy-Efficient Positioning-Enabled MAC Protocol (PMAC) for UWB Sensor Networks. In: Proceedings of IST Mobile and Wireless Communications Summit, Dresden, Germany, pp. 95–107 (June 2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Polastre, J., Hill, J., Culler, D.: Versatile low power media access for wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, SenSys 2004, pp. 95–107. ACM Press, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Buettner, M., Yee, G.V., Anderson, E., Han, R.: X-mac: a short preamble mac protocol for duty-cycled wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, SenSys 2006, pp. 307–320. ACM Press, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chipcon Products From Texas Instruments, CC2420 - Data sheet,
  10. 10.
    Alcock, P., Roedig, U., Hazas, M.: Combining Positioning and Communication Using UWB Transceivers. In: Krishnamachari, B., Suri, S., Heinzelman, W., Mitra, U. (eds.) DCOSS 2009. LNCS, vol. 5516, pp. 329–342. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    PulsOn 200 Evaluation Kit from Time Domain, PulsOn P220 - Evaluation Kit,

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Alcock
    • 1
  • James Brown
    • 1
  • Utz Roedig
    • 1
  1. 1.Lancaster UniversityUK

Personalised recommendations