A Study on the Effectiveness of Cooperative Learning in College English Writing

  • Li-zhen Huang
  • Fang Tang
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6483)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to see whether students in experimental class outscore their counterparts in control class in writing and what students’ attitudes towards cooperative learning are. The experiment lasts 17 weeks. The main instruments in the experiment are pre-test, post-test and questionnaires. The results show that: (1) There are no significant differences between control class and experimental class in writing scores before and after the experiment; and (2) the students have a positive attitude towards cooperative learning in English writing. Most of them become more confident, like learning from each other and have better writing habits.

Keywords

cooperative learning college English writing effectiveness learning groups 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T.: Making cooperative learning work. Theory Into Practice 38(2), 67–73 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kagan, S.: Cooperative Learning. Kagan Cooperative Learning, San Clemente (1994)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Louth, R., McAllister, C., McAllister, H.A.: The Effects of Collaborative writing techniques on freshman writing and attitudes. Journal of Experimental Education 61(3), 215–224 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stevens, R.J., Mdden, N.A., Slavin, R.E., Farnish, A.M.: Cooperative integrated reading and comprehension: two field experiments. Reading Research Quarterly 22, 433–454 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liu, J.: The application of cooperative integrated reading and writing in English writing in university. Crazy English (Teachers) 6, 16–19 (2006) (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhang, X.: An experimental research on application of cooperative learning in teaching of English writing. Journal of Sichuan International Studies University 3, 137–140 (2006) (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Slavin, R.E.: Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice. Allyn and Bacon, Boston (1995)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cohen, A.D.: Assessing Language Ability in the Classroom. Foreign Language Teaching And Research Press, Beijing (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Iyamu, E.O.S., Ukadike, J.O.: Perception of self-directed cooperative learning among undergraduate students in selected Nigerian universities. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education 3(4), 13–20 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Passig, D., Schwartz, G.: Collaborative writing: online versus frontal. International Journal on E-Learning 6(3), 395–412 (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ross, J.A.: Improving social-environmental studies problem solving through cooperative learning. American Educational Research Journal Winter 25(4), 573–591 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Li-zhen Huang
    • 1
  • Fang Tang
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Foreign LanguagesHainan Normal UniversityHaikouChina
  2. 2.Haikou Economic CollegeHaikouChina

Personalised recommendations