ISVC 2010: Advances in Visual Computing pp 666-677 | Cite as

Modified Region Growing for Stereo of Slant and Textureless Surfaces

  • Rohith MV
  • Gowri Somanath
  • Chandra Kambhamettu
  • Cathleen Geiger
  • David Finnegan
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6453)

Abstract

In this paper, we present an algorithm for estimating disparity for images containing large textureless regions. We propose a fast and efficient region growing algorithm for estimating the stereo disparity. Though we present results on ice images, the algorithm can be easily used for other applications. We modify the first-best region growing algorithm using relaxed uniqueness constraints and matching for sub-pixel values and slant surfaces. We provide an efficient method for matching multiple windows using a linear transform. We estimate the parameters required by the algorithm automatically based on initial correspondences. Our method was tested on synthetic, benchmark and real outdoor data. We quantitatively demonstrated that our method performs well in all three cases.

Keywords

Epipolar Constraint Stereo Algorithm Disparity Range Region Growth Algorithm Stereo Disparity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Akbarzadeh, A., Frahm, J.-M., Mordohai, P., Clipp, B., Engels, C., Gallup, D., Merrell, P., Phelps, M., Sinha, S., Talton, B., Wang, L., Yang, Q., Stewenius, H., Yang, R., Welch, G., Towles, H., Nister, D., Pollefeys, M.: Towards urban 3d reconstruction from video. In: 3DPVT 2006: Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on 3D Data Processing, Visualization, and Transmission (3DPVT 2006), Washington, DC, USA, pp. 1–8. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Murray, D., Little, J.: Using real-time stereo vision for mobile robot navigation. In: Autonomous Robots 2000 (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sumi, Y., Tomita, F.: 3d object recognition using segment-based stereo vision. In: Chin, R., Pong, T.-C. (eds.) ACCV 1998. LNCS, vol. 1352, pp. 249–256. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Worby, A.P., Massom, R., Allison, I., Lytle, V.I., Heil, P.: East antarctic sea ice: a review of its structure, properties and drift. Antarctic Sea Ice Properties, Processes and Variability. AGU Antarctic Research Series, pp. 41–67 (1998)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Worby, A.P., Geiger, C., Paget, M., Woert, M.V., Ackley, S., DeLiberty, T.: The thickness distribution of antarctic sea ice. J. Geophys. Res., 158–170 (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Scharstein, D., Szeliski, R.: A taxonomy and evaluation of dense two-frame stereo correspondence algorithms. International Journal of Computer Vision 47, 7–42 (2002)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lhuillier, M., Quan, L.: A quasi-dense approach to surface reconstruction from uncalibrated images. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 27, 418–433 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Otto, G.P., Chau, T.K.W.: ‘region-growing’ algorithm for matching of terrain images. Image Vision Comput. 7, 83–94 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shin, D., Muller, J.-P.: An explicit growth model of the stereo region growing algorithm for parallel processing. ISPRS Commission V: Close Range Image Measurement Techniques (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Furukawa, Y., Ponce, J.: Accurate, dense, and robust multi-view stereopsis. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2007, pp. 1–8 (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Čech, J., Šára, R.: Efficient sampling of disparity space for fast and accurate matching. In: CVPR Workshop Towards Benchmarking Automated Calibration, Orientation and Surface Reconstruction from Images, BenCOS 2007. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ogale, A.S., Aloimonos, Y.: Shape and the stereo correspondence problem. Int. J. Comput. Vision 65, 147–162 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rohith, M.V., Somanath, G., Kambhamettu, C., Geiger, C.A.: Stereo analysis of low textured regions with application towards sea-ice reconstruction. In: International Conference on Image Processing, Computer Vision, and Pattern Recognition (IPCV), pp. 23–29 (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rohith, M., Somanath, G., Kambhamettu, C., Geiger, C.: Towards estimation of dense disparities from stereo images containing large textureless regions. In: 19th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, ICPR 2008, pp. 1–5 (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Birchfield, S., Tomasi, C.: A pixel dissimilarity measure that is insensitive to image sampling. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 20, 401–406 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kolmogorov, V., Zabih, R.: Computing visual correspondence with occlusions using graph cuts. In: Proceedings of Eighth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, ICCV 2001, vol. 2, pp. 508–5152 (2001)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rohith MV
    • 1
  • Gowri Somanath
    • 1
  • Chandra Kambhamettu
    • 1
  • Cathleen Geiger
    • 2
  • David Finnegan
    • 3
  1. 1.Video/Image Modeling and Synthesis (VIMS) Lab., Department of Computer and Information SciencesUniversity of DelawareNewarkUSA
  2. 2.Department of GeographyUniversity of DelawareNewarkUSA
  3. 3.Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory.U.S. Army Corps of EngineersHanoverUSA

Personalised recommendations