Connecting Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Web Search Process: Analysis Using Search Units

  • Hitomi Saito
  • Masao Takaku
  • Yuka Egusa
  • Hitoshi Terai
  • Makiko Miwa
  • Noriko Kando
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6458)

Abstract

Our final goal is to understand exploratory searches as four levels of search processes: search task, intent unit, search unit, and link unit. To complete these objectives, we used qualitative data to categorize participants’ information needs for search units and quantitatively analyzed whether differences in the information needs of search units influence users’ search processes and how task types and groups affect search units. In the experiment, eleven undergraduates and five graduates conducted information gathering task for writing a report and trip planning. We recorded their verbal protocols during the tasks and post interviews, browser logs, screen captured video, and eye-tracking data. We divided the process of exploratory searches into search units. Then search units were classified into the two types of information needs, navigational and informational, based on qualitative data. We conducted a quantitative analysis to compare between tasks and groups and types of search units. The results showed that there were many differences between the information and navigation search units.

Keywords

Exploratory search search intent information seeking behavior 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bates, M.J.: The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface. Online Review 13(5), 407–424 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Marchionini, G.: Exploratory search: from finding to understanding. Commun. ACM 49(4), 41–46 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Terai, H., Saito, H., Egusa, Y., Takaku, M., Miwa, M., Kando, N.: Differences between informational and transactional tasks in information seeking on the web. In: Proceedings of IIiX 2008, pp. 152–159. ACM, New York (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Saito, H., Terai, H., Egusa, Y., Takaku, M., Miwa, M., Kando, N.: How task types and user experiences affect information-seeking behavior on the web: Using eye-tracking and client-side search. In: Workshop on Understanding the User (UUIR 2009) (SIGIR 2009 Workshop), pp. 19–22 (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Egusa, Y., Saito, H., Takaku, M., Terai, H., Miwa, M., Kando, N.: Link depth: Measuring how far searchers explore web. In: Proceedings of HICSS 2010, pp. 1–8 (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    White, R.W., Roth, R.A.: Exploratory Search: Beyond the Query-Response Paradigm. Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval and Services. Morgan & Claypool, San Francisco (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Broder, A.: A taxonomy of web search. SIGIR Forum 36(2), 3–10 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jansen, B., Pooch, U.: A review of Web searching studies and a framework for future research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 52(3), 235–246 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Silverstein, C., Henzinger, M., Marais, H., Moricz, M.: Analysis of a very large web search engine query log. SIGIR Forum 33(1), 6–12 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    He, D., Göker, A.: Detecting session boundaries from web user logs. In: Proceedings of the BCS-IRSG 22nd Annual Colloquium on Information Retrieval Research, pp. 57–66 (2000)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    White, R.W., Drucker, S.M.: Investigating behavioral variability in web search. In: Proceedings of WWW 2007, pp. 21–30 (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Guo, Q., Agichtein, E.: Beyond session segmentation: predicting changes in search intent with client-side user interactions. In: Proceedings of SIGIR 2009, pp. 636–637 (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hitomi Saito
    • 1
  • Masao Takaku
    • 2
  • Yuka Egusa
    • 3
  • Hitoshi Terai
    • 4
  • Makiko Miwa
    • 5
  • Noriko Kando
    • 6
  1. 1.Aichi University of EducationKariyaJapan
  2. 2.National Institute for Materials ScienceTsukubaJapan
  3. 3.National Institute for Educational Policy ResearchTokyoJapan
  4. 4.Nagoya UniversityNagoyaJapan
  5. 5.The Open University of JapanChibaJapan
  6. 6.National Institute of InformaticsTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations