Improvements of Webometrics by Using Sentiment Analysis for Better Accessibility of the Web
The paper discusses the webometric model for effective acquirement of relevant information from the web that would better separate the useful data from the useless. Our research emphasis has been placed on techniques that would better reflect the semantic content of single pages. Webometrics is purely a quantitative approach to the web, which can be enhanced by qualitative methods and thereby allows us to expand the possibilities of a study problem. Sentiment analysis may be used as a qualitative complement to quantitative approach. This analysis provides a technique of sophisticated analysis of sentences using mathematical and statistical methods and linguistic analysis of text. Extension of the webometric techniques of sentiment analysis methods leads up to a better machine understanding of a web page and its overall semantic meaning. It can be assumed that the designed model will reduce the irrelevant web search results and thereby facilitate user access to the information on the web. The introductory part of the paper explains the concept of the sentiment analysis and the basic functional background of the webometric techniques.
KeywordsWebometrics Sentiment analysis Semantics Web 2.0
- 1.Aguillo, I.F., Ortega, J.L., Fernández, M.: Webometric Ranking of World Universities: Introduction, Methodology, and Future Developments. Higher Education in Europe 33(3), 234–244 (2008)Google Scholar
- 2.Han, S.K., Shin, D., Jung, J.Y., Park, J.: Exploring the Relationship between Keywords and Feed Elements in Blog Post Search. World Wide Web - Internet and Web Information Systems 12(4), 381–398 (2009)Google Scholar
- 11.Thelwall, M.: Introduction to Webometrics: Quantitative Web Research for the Social Sciences. Morgan & Claypool, San Rafael (2009), ISBN 9781598299946Google Scholar
- 12.Thelwall, M., Wilkinson, D.: Public dialogs in social network sites: What is their purpose? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61(2), 392–404 (2010)Google Scholar