Argumentation-Based Preference Modelling with Incomplete Information
No intelligent decision support system functions even remotely without knowing the preferences of the user. A major problem is that the way average users think about and formulate their preferences does not match the utility-based quantitative frameworks currently used in decision support systems. For the average user qualitative models are a better fit. This paper presents an argumentation-based framework for the modelling of, and automated reasoning about multi-issue preferences of a qualitative nature. The framework presents preferences according to the lexicographic ordering that is well-understood by humans. The main contribution of the paper is that it shows how to reason about preferences when only incomplete information is available. An adequate strategy is proposed that allows reasoning with incomplete information and it is shown how to incorporate this strategy into the argumentation-based framework for modelling preferences.
KeywordsQualitative Preferences Argumentation Incomplete Information
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Amgoud, L., Maudet, N., Parsons, S.: Modelling dialogues using argumentation. In: Proc. ICMAS (2000)Google Scholar
- 3.Boutilier, C.: Toward a logic for qualitative decision theory. In: Proc. KR, pp. 75–86 (1994)Google Scholar
- 5.Brewka, G.: A rank based description language for qualitative preferences. In: Proc. ECAI (2004)Google Scholar
- 7.Coste-Marquis, S., Lang, J., Liberatore, P., Marquis, P.: Expressive power and succinctness of propositional languages for preference representation. In: Proc. KR, pp. 203–212 (2004)Google Scholar
- 8.Doyle, J., Thomason, R.H.: Background to qualitative decision theory. AI Magazine 20(2), 55–68 (1999)Google Scholar
- 9.Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Possibility theory as a basis for qualitative decision theory. In: Proc. IJCAI (1995)Google Scholar
- 13.Liu, F.: Changing for the Better: Preference Dynamics and Agent Diversity. PhD thesis, Universiteit van Amsterdam (2008)Google Scholar
- 14.Prakken, H.: A study of accrual of arguments, with applications to evidential reasoning. In: Proc. ICAIL, pp. 85–94 (2005)Google Scholar