Interactive Visualization of Interdependencies and Vulnerabilities in Constrained Environments

  • Nils Lunden
  • Robin Sveen
  • Hans Lund
  • Nils Svendsen
  • Stephen Wolthusen
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 342)


Many critical infrastructure assets from hospitals to industrial facilities rely on multiple infrastructure services whose close proximity can result in the failure of one component causing cascading failures in other assets. Ths effective analysis and mitigation of risks requires the consideration of numerous scenarios and input from domain experts.

This paper describes a distributed interactive visualization and analysis mechanism for constrained environments such as buildings and industrial facilities in which the physical and logical components and dependencies are considered in a three-dimensional model. Physical effects modeled include flooding, fire, smoke and gas explosions; the logical dependencies considered include telecommunications and electrical power. This allows the creation of scenarios by interactively creating events whose effects are subsequently captured by physical and logical sub-models that can be viewed and replayed from multiple angles to permit efficient analysis and review. The capabilities of the system are illustrated using a complex scenario of cascading physical and logical failures resulting from a water leakage in a hospital environment.


Visualization concurrent models distributed simulation 


  1. 1.
    Abraham, R., Marsden, J.: Foundations of Mechanics. Addison-Wesley, Redwood City (1987)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bates, P., De Roo, A.: A simple raster-based model for flood inundation simulation. Journal of Hydrology 236(1-2), 54–77 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boeing, A., Braun, T.: Evaluation of real-time physics simulation systems. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques in Australia and Southeast Asia, pp. 281–288 (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cleaver, R., Humphreys, C., Morgan, J., Robinson, C.: Development of a model to predict the effects of explosions in compact congested regions. Journal of Hazardous Materials 53(1), 35–55 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Diaz Alonso, F., Gonzalez Ferradasa, E., Sanchez Perez, J., Minana Aznara, A., Ruiz Gimenoa, J., Martinez Alonso, J.: Characteristic overpressure-impulse-distance curves for vapor cloud explosions using the TNO multi-energy model. Journal of Hazardous Materials 137(2), 734–741 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Drysdale, D.: An Introduction to Fire Dynamics. John Wiley, Chichester (1999)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Forney, G.: Smokeview (Version 5) – A Tool for Visualizing Fire Dynamics Simulation Data, Volume II: Technical Reference Guide, NIST Special Publication. National Institute of Standards and Technology, pp. 1017–1012. Gaithersburg, Maryland (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kundu, P., Cohen, I.: Fluid Mechanics. Academic Press, Burlington (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Maciel, A., Halic, T., Lu, Z., Nedel, L., De Using, S.: the PhysX engine for physics-based virtual surgery with force feedback. International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery 5(3), 341–353 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Marks, S., Windsor, J., Wunsche, B.: Evaluation of game engines for simulated surgical training. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques in Australia and Southeast Asia, pp. 273–280 (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    McGrattan, K., Hostika, S., Floyd, J., Baum, H., Rehm, R., Mell, W., McDermott, R.: Fire Dynamics Simulator (Version 5), Technical Reference Guide, Volume I: Mathematical Model, NIST Special Publication. National Institute of Standards and Technology, pp. 1018–1015. Gaithersburg, Maryland (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Neal, J., Fewtrell, T., Bates, P., Wright, N.: A comparison of three parallelization methods for 2D flood inundation models. Environmental Modeling and Software 25(4), 398–411 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Olenick, S., Carpenter, D.: An updated international survey of computer models for fire and smoke. Journal of Fire Protection Engineering 13(2), 87–110 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rohde, M., Toschlog, M.: Toward the fusion of serious simulation and video games. Proceedings of the Spring Simulation Multiconference: Military Modeling and Simulation Symposium 71 (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schubert, J., Sanders, B., Smith, M., Wright, N.: Unstructured mesh generation and landcover-based resistance for hydrodynamic modeling of urban flooding. Advances in Water Resources 31(12), 1603–1621 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Smith, R.: Open Dynamics Engine (v0 (2006),
  17. 17.
    Svendsen, N.: Interdependencies in Critical Infrastructures: A Qualitative Approach to Model Physical, Logical and Geographical Interdependencies, Ph. Gjovik University College, Gjovik, Norway (2008)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Svendsen, N., Wolthusen, S.: A framework for 3D geospatial buffering of events of interest in critical infrastructures. In: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Critical Information Infrastructures Security, pp. 37–48 (2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Svendsen, N., Wolthusen, S.: Multigraph dependency models for heterogeneous infrastructures. In: Goetz, E., Shenoi, S. (eds.) Critical Infrastructure Protection, pp. 337–350. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Weigand, B.: Analytical Methods for Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow Problems. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yeh, T., Reinman, G., Patel, S., Faloutsos, P.: Fool me twice: Exploring and exploiting error tolerance in physics-based animation. ACM Transactions on Graphics 29(1), 1–11 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nils Lunden
  • Robin Sveen
  • Hans Lund
  • Nils Svendsen
  • Stephen Wolthusen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations