Exploring EFL Taiwanese University Students’ Perceptions of a Collaborative CALL Environment

  • Yen-Hui Wang
  • Chia-Nan Wang
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6421)


This study aimed to investigate the perceptions of EFL Taiwanese university students on a collaborative CALL environment. The participants were 112 intermediate proficiency English as a foreign language Taiwanese third-year university students. The dataset used included the pre-and post-questionnaires on participants’ perspectives on the CALL environment. In addition, interview data was collected for more in-depth information on individual participants’ perceived views on such a collaborative e-learning program. The results of the study provided encouraging evidence to show that the participants generally perceived that they benefited from the whole process of a collaborative computer assisted language learning program to have positive perspectives on the implemented CALL course itself, to advance their English linguistic knowledge, to construct associated content knowledge, and to foster their affective attitudes towards learning language via a collaborative CALL environment. The findings suggested the need for Taiwanese language teachers, course writers, curriculum planners, policy makers, and educational authorities to consider integrating CALL components into English language lessons to help Taiwanese students improve language competence, gain content knowledge, develop cooperative learning, and strengthen motivation for EFL learning.


EFL (English as a Foreign Language) CALL (Computer Assisted Language Learning) perceptions of a collaborative CALL environment 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arvan, L., Musumeci, D.: Instructor attitudes within the SCALE efficiency Projects. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network 4(3), 196–215 (2000)Google Scholar
  2. Ayres, R.: Learner attitudes towards the use of CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning 15, 241–249 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blake, R., Delforge, A.M.: Online language learning: The case of Spanish without walls. In: Salaberry, R., Lafford, B.A. (eds.) The art of teaching Spanish: Second language acquisition from research to praxis, pp. 127–148. Georgetown University Press, Washington (2006)Google Scholar
  4. Bonk, C.J., Graham, C.R.: Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. Pfeiffer Publishing, San Francisco (2006)Google Scholar
  5. den Brok, P., Brekelmans, M., Wubbels, T.: Multilevel issues in research using students’ perceptions of learning environments: The case of the questionnaire on teacher interaction. Learning Environments Research 9(3), 199–213 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Collentine, J.: Insights into the construction of grammatical knowledge provided by userbehavior tracking technologies. Language Learning and Technology 3, 44–57 (2000)Google Scholar
  7. Coniam, D.: Evaluating computer-based and paper-based versions of an English-language listening test. ReCALL 18(2), 193–211 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cononelos, T., Oliva, M.: Using computer networks to enhance foreign Language/culture Education. Foreign Language Annals 26, 524–534 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dunkel, P.: Computer-assisted instruction (CAI) and computer-assisted language learning (CALL): Past dilemmas and future prospects for audible CALL. Modern Language Journal 71, 250–260 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Felix, U.: The web’s potential for language learning: The student’s perspective. ReCALL 13, 47–58 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ginns, P., Ellis, R.: Quality in blended learning: Exploring the relationships between on-line and face-to-face teaching and learning. The Internet and Higher Education 10(1), 53–64 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hannafin, M.J., Land, S.M.: The foundations and assumptions of technology-enhanced student-centered learning environments. Instructional Science 25, 167–202 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kern, R.G.: Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: Effects on quantity and quality of language production. The Modern Language Journal 79, 457–476 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kitao, K.: Students’ evaluation of CAI English classes. Doshisha Studies in English 64, 117–160 (1995)Google Scholar
  15. Lee, L.: Using web-based instruction to promote active learning: Learners’ Perspectives. CALICO Journal 23(1), 139–156 (2005)Google Scholar
  16. Lin, C.: Constructivism and Second Language Learning: A Web-Based Reading-Writing Activity. Unpublished master thesis. National Taiwan Normal University, Taiwan (2002)Google Scholar
  17. Lin, Y.: The effects of e-books on EFL learners’ reading attitudes. Unpublished master thesis. National Taiwan Normal University, Taiwan (2009)Google Scholar
  18. Liou, H.: The impact of WWW texts on EFL learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning 10, 455–478 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Meyer, J., Muller, M.: Evaluating the quality of student learning: I. An unfolding analysis of the association between perceptions of learning context and approaches to studying at an individual level. Studies in Higher Education 15, 131–154 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Murray, G.L.: Autonomy and language learning in a simulated environment. System 27, 295–308 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Neumeier, P.: A closer look at blended learning – parameters for designing a blended learning environment for language teaching and learning. ReCALL 17(2), 163–178 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pawling, E.: Modern languages and CD-ROM-based learning. British Journal of Educational Technology 30(2), 163–175 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Peterson, M.: Software review: The grammar Rom. ONCALL 11(1997), (Retrieved January 3, 2010)
  24. Piotrowski, C., Vadonovich, S.J.: Are the reported barriers to Internet-based instruction warranted?: A synthesis of recent research. Education 121(1), 48–53 (2000)Google Scholar
  25. Ramsden, P.: A performance indicatory of teaching quality in higher education: The course experience questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education 16, 129–150 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rivers, W.M.: Interactive language teaching. Cambridge University Press, New York (1987)Google Scholar
  27. So, H.J., Brush, T.A.: Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: Relationships and critical factors. Computers & Education 51(1), 318–336 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Strepp-Greany, J.: Student perceptions on language learning in a technological Environment: Implications for the new millennium. Language Learning and Technology 6, 165–180 (2002)Google Scholar
  29. Sun, Y., Dong, Q.: An experiment on supporting children’s English vocabulary learning in multimedia context. Computer Assisted Language Learning 17(2), 131–147 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ushida, E.: The role of students’ attitudes and motivation in second language learning in online language courses. CALICO Journal 23, 49–78 (2005)Google Scholar
  31. Vygotsky, L.S.: Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1978)Google Scholar
  32. Zapata, G.C., Sagarra, N.: CALL on hold: The delayed benefits of an online workbook on L2 vocabulary learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning 20(2), 153–171 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yen-Hui Wang
    • 1
  • Chia-Nan Wang
    • 2
  1. 1.Kainan UniversityTaiwan
  2. 2.National Kaohsiung University of Applied SciencesTaiwan

Personalised recommendations