Context Information in Guiding Visual Search: The Role of Color and Orientation

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6389)


At work and at leisure people perform various visual search tasks, e.g. they search for a particular icon in software tools, on Web sites or on mobile phones. With an increasing number of items, visual search becomes difficult. Recently, it has been suggested that the so-called contextual cueing effect, which is known from psychological experiments, can be applied to improve visual search performance. Contextual cueing leads to decreased search times for target objects within familiar context configurations. It is assumed that associations between context configurations and target locations are learned implicitly and then used to guide the allocation of attention to the relevant object. In accordance with demands for interface consistency, this mechanism could be interesting for the development of user interfaces. The present study investigated which object features (e.g. color or orientation) can establish the learning process. The results show that implicit learning of color and orientation arrangements are possible, but the transfer to configuration with changed features depends on the recent learning history. Implications of these results are discussed with respect to the design of user interfaces.


Interface Consistency Contextual Cueing Visual Attention Learning 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Treisman, A., Gormican, S.: Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review 95, 15–48 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Bravo, M.J., Nakayama, K.: The role of attention in different visual-search tasks. Perception & Psychophysics 51, 465–472 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Yantis, S., Jonides, J.: Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 10, 601–621 (1984)Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Wang, Q., Cavanagh, P., Green, M.: Familiarity and pop-out in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics 56, 495–500 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Johnston, W.A., et al.: Attention capture by novel stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 119, 397–411 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Krug, S.: Don’t Make Me Think! A Common Sense Approach to Web Usability. New Ryders, Indianapolis (2000)Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Chun, M.M., Jiang, Y.H.: Top-down attentional guidance based on implicit learning of visual covariation. Psychological Science 10, 360–365 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Ozok, A.A., Salvendy, G.: Measuring consistency of Web page design and its effects on performance and satisfaction. Ergonomics 43(4), 443–460 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Holzinger, A., Stickel, C., Fassold, M., Ebner, M.: Seeing the System through the End Users Eyes: Shadow Expert Technique for Evaluating the Consistency of a Learning Management System. In: Holzinger, A., Miesenberger, K. (eds.) USAB 2009. LNCS, vol. 5889, pp. 178–192. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Schneider, W., Shiffrin, R.M.: Controlled and automatic human information processing: detection, search and attention. Psychological Review 84, 1–66 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    AlTaboli, A., Abou-Zeid, R.: Effect of Physical Consistency of Web Interface Design on Users Performance and Satisfaction. In: Jacko, J.A. (ed.) HCI 2007. LNCS, vol. 4553, pp. 849–859. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Schankin, A., Stursberg, O., Schubö, A.: The role of implicit context information in guiding visual-spatial attention. In: Caputo, B., Vincze, M. (eds.) ICVW 2008. LNCS, vol. 5329, pp. 93–106. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Endo, N., Takeda, Y.: Selective learning of spatial configuration and object identity in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics 66(2), 293–302 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Song, J.-H., Jiang, Y.: Connecting the past with the present: How do humans match an incoming visual display with visual memory? Journal of Vision 5, 322–330 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Kunar, M.A., Flusberg, S., Horowitz, T.S., Wolfe, J.M.: Does Contextual cueing Guide the Deployment of Attention? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 33(4), 816–828 (2007)Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Schankin, A., Schubö, A.: Cognitive processes facilitated by contextual cueing. Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology 46, 668–679 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Godijn, R., Pratt, J.: Endogenous saccades are preceded by shifts of visual attention. Evidence from cross-saccadic priming effects 110(1), 83–102 (2002)Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Stößel, C., Wiesbeck, M., Stork, S., Zäh, M.F., Schubö, A.: Towards Optimal Worker Assistance: Investigating Cognitive Processes in Manual Assembly. In: Proc. of the 41st CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems, pp. 245–250 (2008)Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Findlay, J.M.: Saccade Target Selection During Visual Search. Vision Research 37(5), 617–631 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Findlay, J.M., Brown, V.: Eye scanning of multi-element displays: I. Scanpath planning, Vision Research 46, 179–195 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Howard, J.H., Howard, D.V., Dennis, N.A., Yankovich, H., Vaidyab, C.J.: Implicit Spatial Contextual Learning in Healthy Aging. Neuropsychology 18(1), 124–134 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department PsychologyLudwig Maximilian University MunichMunichGermany
  2. 2.Institute of PsychologyRuprecht Karls University HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany

Personalised recommendations