Advertisement

A Case Study in Model-Based Adaptation of Web Services

  • Javier Cámara
  • José Antonio Martín
  • Gwen Salaün
  • Carlos Canal
  • Ernesto Pimentel
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6416)

Abstract

Developing systems through the composition of reusable software services is not straightforward in most situations since different kinds of mismatch may occur among their public interfaces. Service adaptation plays a key role in the development of such systems by solving, as automatically as possible, mismatch cases at the different interoperability levels among interfaces by synthesizing a mediating adaptor between services. In this paper, we show the application of model-based adaptation techniques for the construction of service-based systems on a case study. We describe each step of the adaptation process, starting with the automatic extraction of behavioural models from existing interface descriptions, until the final adaptor implementation is generated for the target platform.

Keywords

Service Composition Service Interface Specialist Doctor Client Interface Adaptor Protocol 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Pi4SOA Project, http://www.pi4soa.org
  2. 2.
    Brogi, A., Bracciali, A., Canal, C.: A formal approach to component adaptation. The Journal of Systems and Software 74, 45–54 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Autili, M., Inverardi, P., Navarra, A., Tivoli, M.: SYNTHESIS: A Tool for Automatically Assembling Correct and Distributed Component-based Systems. In: Proc. of ICSE 2007, pp. 784–787. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brogi, A., Popescu, R.: Automated generation of BPEL adapters. In: Dan, A., Lamersdorf, W. (eds.) ICSOC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4294, pp. 27–39. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cámara, J., Martín, J.A., Salaün, G., Cubo, J., Ouederni, M., Canal, C., Pimentel, E.: ITACA: An Integrated Toolbox for the Automatic Composition and Adaptation of Web Services. In: Proc. of ICSE 2009, pp. 627–630. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Canal, C., Poizat, P., Salaün, G.: Model-based adaptation of behavioural mismatching components. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 4(34), 546–563 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cubo, J., Salaün, G., Canal, C., Pimentel, E., Poizat, P.: A Model-Based Approach to the Verification and Adaptation of WF/.NET Components. In: Proc. of FACS 2007. ENTCS, vol. 215, pp. 39–55. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dumas, M., Spork, M., Wang, K.: Adapt or Perish: Algebra and Visual Notation for Service Interface Adaptation. In: Dustdar, S., Fiadeiro, J.L., Sheth, A.P. (eds.) BPM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4102, pp. 65–80. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Foster, H., Uchitel, S., Kramer, J.: LTSA-WS: A Tool for Model-based Verification of Web Service Compositions and Choreography. In: Proc. of ICSE 2006, pp. 771–774. ACM Press, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fu, X., Bultan, T., Su, J.: Analysis of Interacting BPEL Web Services. In: Proc. of WWW 2004, pp. 621–630. ACM Press, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    ISO/IEC: LOTOS — A Formal Description Technique Based on the Temporal Ordering of Observational Behaviour. International Standard 8807, ISO (1989)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mateescu, R., Poizat, P., Salaün, G.: Adaptation of Service Protocols using Process Algebra and On-the-Fly Reduction Techniques. In: Bouguettaya, A., Krueger, I., Margaria, T. (eds.) ICSOC 2008. LNCS, vol. 5364, pp. 84–99. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nezhad, H.R.M., Benatallah, B., Martens, A., Curbera, F., Casati, F.: Semi-automated adaptation of service interactions. In: Proc. of WWW 2007, pp. 993–1002. ACM, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Poizat, P., Salaün, G.: Adaptation of Open Component-based Systems. In: Bonsangue, M.M., Johnsen, E.B. (eds.) FMOODS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4468, pp. 141–156. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Salaün, G.: Generation of Service Wrapper Protocols from Choreography Specifications. In: Proc. of SEFM 2008, pp. 313–322. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2008)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Salaün, G., Bordeaux, L., Schaerf, M.: Describing and Reasoning on Web Services using Process Algebra. International Journal of Business Process Integration and Management 1(2), 116–128 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yellin, D.M., Strom, R.E.: Protocol specifications and component adaptors. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems 2(19), 292–333 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Javier Cámara
    • 1
  • José Antonio Martín
    • 2
  • Gwen Salaün
    • 3
  • Carlos Canal
    • 2
  • Ernesto Pimentel
    • 2
  1. 1.INRIA Rhône-AlpesFrance
  2. 2.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of MálagaSpain
  3. 3.Grenoble INP-INRIA-LIGFrance

Personalised recommendations