Advertisement

Abstract

We describe the different issues that a language designer has to tackle when defining error handling mechanisms for service-oriented computing. We first discuss the issues that have to be considered when developing error handling mechanisms inside a process calculus, i.e. an abstract model. We then analyze how these issues change when moving from a process calculus to a full-fledged language based on it. We consider as an example the language Jolie, and the calculus SOCK it is based upon.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Banti, F., et al.: Specification and analysis of SOC systems using COWS: A finance case study. In: Proc. of WWV 2008. ENTCS, vol. 235, pp. 71–105. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bruni, R., et al.: Comparing two approaches to compensable flow composition. In: Abadi, M., de Alfaro, L. (eds.) CONCUR 2005. LNCS, vol. 3653, pp. 383–397. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bruni, R., Melgratti, H., Montanari, U.: Theoretical foundations for compensations in flow composition languages. In: Proc. of POPL 2005, pp. 209–220. ACM Press, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Busi, N., Gorrieri, R., Guidi, C., Lucchi, R., Zavattaro, G.: SOCK: a calculus for service oriented computing. In: Dan, A., Lamersdorf, W. (eds.) ICSOC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4294, pp. 327–338. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Butler, M.J., Ferreira, C.: An operational semantics for StAC, a language for modelling long-running business transactions. In: De Nicola, R., Ferrari, G.-L., Meredith, G. (eds.) COORDINATION 2004. LNCS, vol. 2949, pp. 87–104. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Guidi, C., Lanese, I., Montesi, F., Zavattaro, G.: On the interplay between fault handling and request-response service invocations. In: Proc. of ACSD 2008, pp. 190–199. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Guidi, C., Lanese, I., Montesi, F., Zavattaro, G.: Dynamic error handling in service oriented applications. Fundamenta Informaticae 95(1), 73–102 (2009)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hoare, C.A.R.: Communicating Sequential Processes. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1985)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
    Lanese, I.: Static vs dynamic sagas. In: Proc. of ICE 2010 (to appear, 2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lanese, I., Vaz, C., Ferreira, C.: On the expressive power of primitives for compensation handling. In: Gordon, A.D. (ed.) Programming Languages and Systems. LNCS, vol. 6012, pp. 366–386. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lanese, I., Zavattaro, G.: Programming Sagas in SOCK. In: Proc. of SEFM 2009, pp. 189–198. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Laneve, C., Zavattaro, G.: Foundations of web transactions. In: Sassone, V. (ed.) FOSSACS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3441, pp. 282–298. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lapadula, A., Pugliese, R., Tiezzi, F.: A formal account of WS-BPEL. In: Lea, D., Zavattaro, G. (eds.) COORDINATION 2008. LNCS, vol. 5052, pp. 199–215. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lohmann, N.: A feature-complete petri net semantics for WS-BPEL 2.0. In: Dumas, M., Heckel, R. (eds.) WS-FM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4937, pp. 77–91. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lucchi, R., Mazzara, M.: A pi-calculus based semantics for WS-BPEL. J. Log. Algebr. Program. 70(1), 96–118 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Milner, R.: A Calculus of Communicating Systems. LNCS, vol. 92. Springer, Heidelberg (1980)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Milner, R., Parrow, J., Walker, J.: A calculus of mobile processes, I and II. Information and Computation 100(1), 1–40, 41–77 (1992)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Montesi, F., Guidi, C., Lanese, I., Zavattaro, G.: Dynamic fault handling mechanisms for service-oriented applications. In: Proc. of ECOWS 2008, pp. 225–234. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2008)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Montesi, F., Guidi, C., Zavattaro, G.: Composing services with JOLIE. In: Proc. of ECOWS 2007, pp. 13–22. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2007)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Oasis. Web Services Business Process Execution Language Version 2.0 (2007), http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsbpel/2.0/wsbpel-v2.0.html
  22. 22.
    Ouyang, C., Verbeek, E., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Breutel, S., Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A.H.M.: Formal semantics and analysis of control flow in WS-BPEL. Sci. Comput. Program. 67(2-3), 162–198 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sensoria Project. Public web site, http://sensoria.fast.de/
  24. 24.
    Vaz, C., Ferreira, C., Ravara, A.: Dynamic recovering of long running transactions. In: Kaklamanis, C., Nielson, F. (eds.) TGC 2008. LNCS, vol. 5474, pp. 201–215. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    W3C. Web services description language (wsdl) version 2.0 part 0: Primer (2007), http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20-primer/
  26. 26.
    Wirsing, M., et al.: Semantic-based development of service-oriented systems. In: Najm, E., Pradat-Peyre, J.-F., Donzeau-Gouge, V.V. (eds.) FORTE 2006. LNCS, vol. 4229, pp. 24–45. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ivan Lanese
    • 1
  • Fabrizio Montesi
    • 2
  1. 1.Focus TeamUniversità di Bologna/INRIABolognaItaly
  2. 2.Focus TeamUniversità di Bologna/INRIA, Bologna and italianaSoftware s.r.l.Italy

Personalised recommendations