Advertisement

Ontology-Driven Pervasive Service Composition for Everyday Life

  • Jiehan Zhou
  • Ekaterina Gilman
  • Jukka Riekki
  • Mika Rautiainen
  • Mika Ylianttila
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6415)

Abstract

Incorporating service composition and pervasive computing into managing user’s everyday activities gives rise to the paradigm of Pervasive Service Composition for everyday life. This paper presents a novel generic model for services supporting everyday activities. The resulting service composition consists of local services within service peers and services are executed as specified in peer coordination and service collaboration. We suggest a task-based, pervasive, semantic, and P2P-based approach for service composition for everyday life. We first address these fundamental characteristics. We give terminologies related to service composition, pervasive computing, ontology, and Pervasive Service Composition. Secondly, we analyze requirements for describing everyday activities. To meet the requirements we design an initial ontology model for capturing user’s everyday activity and accommodating peer coordination and service collaboration in Pervasive Service Composition. Finally, we classify existing approaches to Web service composition.

Keywords

pervasive computing service computing semantic Web services ontology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    BPEL4WS, Business Process Execution Language for Web Services (2007), http://xml.coverpages.org/WS-BPEL-CS01.pdf (retrieved by May 30, 2010)
  2. 2.
    Barros, A., Dumas, M., Oaks, P.: A critical overview of the web services choreography description language. BPTrends (March 2005), http://www.bptrends.com/publicationfiles/03-05%20wp%20ws-cdl%20barros%20et%20al.pdf (retrieved by May 30, 2010)
  3. 3.
    Miller, J., Verma, K., Rajasekaran, P., Sheth, A., Aggarwal, R., Sivashanmugam, K.: WSDL-S: A Proposal to W3C WSDL 2.0 Committee (2004), http://lsdis.cs.uga.edu/projects/wsdl-s/WSDL-S.pdf (retrieved by May 30, 2010)
  4. 4.
    Domingue, J., Cabral, L., Galizia, S., Tanasescu, V., Gugliotta, A., Norton, B., Pedrinaci, C.: IRS-III: A Broker-based Approach to Semantic Web Services. Journal of Web Semantics 6, 109–132 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Battle, S., Bernstein, A., Boley, H., Grosof, B., Gruninger, M., Hull, R., Kifer, M., Martin, D., McIlraith, S., McGuinness, D., Su, J., Tabet , S.: Semantic Web Services Framework (SWSF), Overview (September 2005), http://www.w3.org/Submission/SWSF/ (retrieved by May 30, 2010)
  6. 6.
    Weiser, M.: The computer for the 21st century. Scientific American 265, 94–104 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    da Costa, C.A.: Toward a General Software Infrastructure for Ubiquitous Computing. IEEE Pervasive Computing 7, 64–73 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Issarny, V., Sacchetti, D., Tartanoglu, F., Sailhan, F., Chibout, R., Levy, N., Talamona, A.: Developing Ambient Intelligence Systems: A Solution based on Web Services. Autom. Software. Eng. 12 (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    IST-Amigo, Amigo: Ambient intelligence for the networked home environment (2006), http://www.hitech-projects.com/euprojects/amigo/ (retrieved by May 30, 2010)
  10. 10.
    Ylianttila, M., Harjula, E., Koskela, T., Sauvola, J.: Analytical Model for Mobile P2P Data Management Systems. In: Proceedings of 5th IEEE on Consumer Communications and Networking Conference, CCNC 2008, pp. 1186–1190 (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pakkala, D., Koivukoski, A., Paaso, T., Latvakoski, J.: P2P middleware for extending the reach, scale and functionality of content delivery networks. In: Proceedings of Second International Conference on Internet and Web Applications and Services, p. 5 (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    p2psip working group, Peer-to-Peer Session Initiation Protocol Specification (2009-03-30), http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/p2psip-charter.html (retreived by May 30, 2010)
  13. 13.
    Lee, T.B., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The Semantic Web. Sci. Am. (May 2001)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Booth, D., Haas, H., McCabe, F., Newcomer, E., Champion, M., Ferris, C., Orchard, D.: Web services architecture (February 2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-arch/ (retrieved by May 30, 2010)
  15. 15.
    W. C. SOAP: SOAP Version 1.2 Part 1: Messaging Framework (2003), http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/REC-soap12-part1-20030624/ (retrieved by May 30, 2010)
  16. 16.
    W3C-WSDL, WSDL: Web Services Description Language (WSDL) 1.1 (2005), http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl
  17. 17.
    UDDI, UDDI Version 3.0.2 (2004), http://www.Oasis-Open.org/committees/uddi-spec/doc/spec/v3/uddi-v3.0.2-20041019.Htm (retrieved by May 30, 2010)
  18. 18.
    Weerawarana, S., Curbera, F.: Business Process with BPEL4WS: Understanding BPEL4WS (2002), http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/webservices/library/ws-bpelcol1/ (retrieved by May 30, 2010)
  19. 19.
    Cabral, L., Domingue, J., Motta, E., Payne, T., Hakimpour, F.: Approaches to semantic web services: An overview and comparison. In: Bussler, C.J., Davies, J., Fensel, D., Studer, R. (eds.) ESWS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3053, pp. 225–239. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rao, J., Su, X.: A survey on automated web service composition methods. In: Cardoso, J., Sheth, A.P. (eds.) SWSWPC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3387, pp. 43–54. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tabatabaei, S.G., Kadir, W.M., Ibrahim, S.: A comparative evaluation of state-of-the-art approaches for web service composition. In: Proceedings of 2008 the Third international Conference on Software Engineering Advances, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 488–493 (2008)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jordan, D., Evdemon, J., Chairs, Alves, A., Arkin, A., Askary, S., Barreto, C., Bloch, B., Curbera, F., Ford, M., Goland, Y., Guízar, A., Kartha, N., Kevin Liu, C., Khalaf, R., König, D., Marin, M., Mehta, V., Thatte, S., van der Rijn, D., Yendluri, P., Yiu, A. (eds.): Web Services Business Process Execution Language Version 2.0, OASIS Standard (2007), http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsbpel/2.0/OS/wsbpel-v2.0-OS.pdf (retrieved by May 30 , 2010)
  23. 23.
    Roman, D., de Bruijn, J., Mocan, A., Toma, I., Lausen, H., Kopecký, J., Fensel, D., Domingue, J., Galizia, S., Cabral, L.: Semantic web services - approaches and perspectives. In: Davies, J., Warren, P., Studer, R. (eds.) Semantic Web Technologies: Trends and Research in Ontology-Based Systems. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (2006)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fensel, D., Bussler, C.: The Web Service Modeling Framework WSMF. Electronic Commerce: Research and Applications 1, 113–137 (2002)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    WSMO working group, WSMO (2009), http://www.wsmo.org (retrieved by May 30, 2010)
  26. 26.
    Roman, D., Scicluna, J. (eds.): Orchestration in WSMO.WSMO Final Draft (2007), http://www.wsmo.org/2005/d15/v0.1/20070422/ (retrieved by May 30, 2010)
  27. 27.
    Roman, D., Keller, U., Lausen, H., de Bruijn, J., Lara, R., Stollberg, M., Polleres, A., Feier, C., Bussler, C., Fensel, D.: Web Service Modeling Ontology. Applied Ontology 1, 77–106 (2005)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    de Bruijn, J.: The Web service modeling language WSML. WSML Final Draft (2005), http://www.wsmo.org/TR/d16/d16.1/v0.21/ (retrieved by May 30, 2010)
  29. 29.
    WSMX, Web service execution environment (2009), http://www.wsmx.org/index.html (retrieved by May 30, 2010)
  30. 30.
    Roman, D., Scicluna, J., Nitzsche, J. (eds.): Ontology-based Choreography. WSMO Final Draft (2007), http://www.wsmo.org/TR/d14/v1.0/ (retrieved by May 30, 2010)
  31. 31.
    Roman, D. (ed.): Choreography in WSMO. WSMO Working Draft (2004), http://www.wsmo.org/2004/d14/v0.1/20041112/ (retrieved by May 30, 2010)
  32. 32.
    Martin, D., Burstein, M., Hobbs, J., et al.: OWL-S: Semantic Markup for Web Services (2004), http://www.w3.org/Submission/OWL-S/ (retrieved by May 30, 2010)
  33. 33.
    Battle, S., Bernstein, A., Boley, H., Grosof, B., Gruninger, M., Hull, R., Kifer, M., Martin, D., McIlraith, S., McGuinness, D., Su, J., Tabet, S.: Semantic Web Services Language (SWSL) (September 2005), http://www.w3.org/Submission/SWSF-SWSL/ (retrieved by May 30, 2010)
  34. 34.
    Battle, S., Bernstein, A., Boley, H., Grosof, B., Gruninger, M., Hull, R., Kifer, M., Martin, D., McIlraith, S., McGuinness, D., Su, J., Tabet, S.: Semantic Web Services Ontology (SWSO) (September 2005), http://www.w3.org/Submission/SWSF-SWSO/ (retrieved by May 30, 2010)
  35. 35.
    Cabral, L., Domingue, J., Galizia, S., Gugliotta, A., Norton, B., Tanasescu, V., Pedrinaci, C.: IRS-III: A broker for semantic web services based applications. Journal of Web Semantics 6(2), 109–132 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Akkiraju, R., Farrell, J., Miller, J., Nagarajan, M., Schmidt, M., Sheth, A., Verma, K.: Web service semantics - WSDL-S. Tech. Rep. A joint UGA-IBM Technical Note, version 1.0 (April 18, 2005), http://www.w3.org/Submission/WSDL-S/ (retrieved by May 30, 2010)
  37. 37.
    Ubiquitous_computing, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ubiquitous_computing (retrieved by May 30, 2010)
  38. 38.
    Contract, free dictionary, http://www.thefreedictionary.com/contract (retrieved by May 30, 2010)
  39. 39.
    business activity, http://www.thefreedictionary.com/business+activity (retrieved by May 30, 2010)
  40. 40.
    Zhou, J., Sun, J., Rautiainen, M., Davidyuk, O., Liu, M., Gilman, E., Su, X., Ylianttila, M., Riekki, J.: PSC-RM: Reference Model for Pervasive Service Composition. In: IEEE Proceedings of Frontier of Computer Science and Technology (FCST 2009), Shanghai, China, December 17-19, pp. 705–709 (2009)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Zhou, J., Riekki, J., Ylianttila, M.: Modeling Service Composition and Exploring its Characteristics, Modeling pervasive service composition. In: IEEE Proceedings of 3rd International Workshop on Web Service Composition and Adaptation (WSCA 2009) in IEEE ICWS 2009, LA, USA, July 6-10, pp. 446–451 (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jiehan Zhou
    • 1
  • Ekaterina Gilman
    • 1
  • Jukka Riekki
    • 1
  • Mika Rautiainen
    • 1
  • Mika Ylianttila
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Science and Engineering Laboratory, Dept. of Electrical EngineeringUniversity of OuluOuluFinland

Personalised recommendations