Sharing Epigraphic Information as Linked Data

  • Fernando-Luis Álvarez
  • Elena García-Barriocanal
  • Joaquín-L. Gómez-Pantoja
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 108)


The diffusion of epigraphic data has evolved in the last years from printed catalogues to indexed digital databases shared through the Web. Recently, the open EpiDoc specifications have resulted in an XML-based schema for the interchange of ancient texts that uses XSLT to render typographic representations. However, these schemas and representation systems are still not providing a way to encode computational semantics and semantic relations between pieces of epigraphic data. This paper sketches an approach to bring these semantics into an EpiDoc based schema using the Ontology Web Language (OWL) and following the principles and methods of information sharing known as “linked data”. The paper describes the general principles of the OWL mapping of the EpiDoc schema and how epigraphic data can be shared in RDF format via dereferenceable URIs that can be used to build advanced search, visualization and analysis systems.


Epigraphy EpiDoc OWL linked data Semantic Web 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Alkhoven, P.: Digitizing Cultural Heritage Collections: The Importance of Training, Humanities, Computer and Cultural Heritage. In: Proceedings of the XVIth Int. Conference of the Association for History and Computing, Amsterdam, pp. 7–11 (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berners-Lee, T.: Linked Data (2006), (Retrieved June 14, 2008)
  3. 3.
    Bizer, B.: The Emerging Web of Linked Data. IEEE Intelligent Systems 24(5), 87–92 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bizer, C.: The Emerging Web of Linked Data. IEEE Intelligent Systems 24(5), 87–92 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bodard, G.: The Inscriptions of Aphrodisias as electronic publication: A user’s perspective and a proposed paradigm. Digital Medievalist 4 (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bowman, A.K., Thomas, J.D.: Vindolanda: The Latin writing-tablets, London, (1983)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bowman, A.K., Thomas, J.D., Adams, J.N.:: The Vindolanda Writing Tablets (Tabulae Vindolandenses II), London (1994)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Breure, L.: PROGENETOR: An editorial framework for reuse of XML content. In: Proceedings of the XVIth International Conference of the Association for History and Computing, September 14-17, pp. 57–63. Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, Amsterdam (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cayless, H.: Tools for Digital Epigraphy. In: Proc. of the Association for Computing in the Humanities/Association for Literary and Linguistic Computing, Athens GA (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Crowther, C.: Building an Image Bank of Inscriptions, V. Imaging Projects, Centre for the Study of Ancient Documents, University of Oxford (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Doerr, M., Schaller, K., Theodoridou, M.: Integration of complementary archaeological sources, en (2004),
  12. 12.
    Gómez-Pantoja, J.L.: Amor virtual o por qué se llevan tan bien inscripciones y ordenadores. In: Iglesias Gil, J. M. (ed.) Patrimonio cultural e informática, Santander (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Harl, F., Schaller, K.: Adapt Computers to Archeology or Adapt Archeology to Computers? Ecole Francaise d’Athenes (February 2004), (Retrieved July 15, 2010)
  14. 14.
    Manuelian, P.: Digital Epigraphy: An Approach to Streamlining Egyptological Epigraphic Method. Journal of the American Research Center in Egypt 35, 97–113 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pasqualis dell’Antonio, S.: From the roman eagle to E.A.G.L.E.: harvesting the web for ancient epigraphy (ed.), Humanities. In: Computers & Cultural Heritage -— Proceedings of the XVI Int’l Conference of the Association for History and Computing, Amsterdam, September 14-17, pp. 224–228 (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Poll, R.: NUMERIC: statistics for the digitisation of European cultural heritage. Program: electronic library & information systems 44(2), 122–131 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Reynolds, J.: Aphrodisias and Rome. Journal of Roman Studies Monographs 1 (1982)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Terras, M.: Image to interpretation: an intelligent system to aid historians in reading the Vindolanda texts. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fernando-Luis Álvarez
    • 1
  • Elena García-Barriocanal
    • 1
  • Joaquín-L. Gómez-Pantoja
    • 2
  1. 1.Information Engineering Research Unit Computer Science Dept.University of AlcaláMadridSpain
  2. 2.Dep. Of History.University of AlcaláMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations