Satellite Observations Defying the Long-Held Tsunami Genesis Theory



Using seismographs and GPS displacement measurements, we have estimated the seafloor deformation history of the December 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake and the March 2005 Nias earthquake by separating their deformation period into intervals of 800-s, 1-h, and 6-months. We have then calculated their corresponding gravity changes (induced by the seafloor deformation), which are 11.3, 12.5, and 14.9 microgalileo, respectively. We show that the seismographs and GPS-derived values are consistent with the known postseismic to coseismic moment ratio of 30% and the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellites measurements of 15 microgalileo for the same period of 6 months. However, the vertical component of the accumulated seafloor deformation during the tsunami formation period (~30 min) could only generate a potential energy of 1.2 × 1015 Joules and account for only one third of the actual tsunami height. The evidence is overwhelmingly contrary to the long-held theory that the vertical deformation of seafloor is the primary source of tsunamis.

Furthermore, we have carefully examined the pioneering wave-maker experiment that initially conceived the ubiquitous tsunami genesis theory. Surprisingly, we found that the experimental ratio of the horizontal slip distance to the water depth – the non-dimensional parameter that allows comparing the experiment with reality on an apple-to-apple basis – was 200 times of realistic earthquake parameters. The experimental conclusion is problematic in conceiving the tsunami theory. By including the horizontal momentum energy transferred by the faulting continental slope in a three-dimensional tsunami model, we have re-examined the December 2004 tsunami using both seismographs and GPS measurements. Our results show that the new theory is more consistent with altimetry and tide data than the conventional theory of using the vertical force alone, suggesting that the tsunami formation mechanism is not as simple as previously thought.


Tsunami genesis theory GRACE Vertical uplift Horizontal displacement Seismograph GPS data 


  1. Abe K (1973) Tsunami and mechanism of great earthquakes. Phys Earth Planet Inter 7:143–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ammon CJ et al. (2005) Rupture process of the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake. Science 20:1133–1139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blewitt G et al. (2006) Rapid determination of earthquake magnitude using GPS for tsunami warning systems. Geophys Res Lett 33:L11309. doi:10.1029/2006GL026145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen JL et al. (2007) GRACE detects coseismic and postseismic deformation from the Sumatra-Andaman earthquake. Geophys Res Lett 34:L13302. doi:10.1029/2007GL030356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chlieh M et al. (2007) Coseismic slip and afterslip of the great Mw 9.15 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake of 2004. Bull Seismol Soc Am 97. doi:10.1785/0120050631Google Scholar
  6. Choi BH, Hong SJ, Pelinovsky E (2006) Distribution of runup heights of the December 24, 2004 tsunami in the Indian Ocean. Geophys Res Lett 33:L13601. doi:10.1029/2006GL025867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dutykh D, Dias F, Kervella Y (2006) Linear theory of wave generation by a moving bottom. C R Acad Sci Paris Ser I 343:499–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Grilli T et al. (2007) Source constraints and model simulation of the December 26, 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami. J Waterway Port Coast Ocean Eng 133(6):414–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hammack JL (1973) A note on tsunamis: their generation and propagation in an ocean of uniform depth. J Fluid Mech 60(4):769–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Han S-C et al. (2006) Crustal dilatation observed by GRACE after the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake. Science 313:658–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hirata K et al. (2006) The 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami: tsunami source model from satellite altimetry. Earth Planets Space 58:195–201Google Scholar
  12. Hjorleifsdottir V (2007) Earthquake source characterization using 3D numerical modeling. PhD Thesis, Caltech.
  13. Hsu Y-J et al. (2006) Frictional afterslip following the 2005 Nias-Simeulue earthquake, Sumatra. Science 312:1921–1926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Imamura F, Shuto N, Ide S, Yoshida Y, Abe K (1993) Estimate of the tsunami source of the 1992 Nicaraguan earthquake from tsunami data. Geophys Res Lett 20(14):1515–1518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Iwasaki S (1982) Experimental study of a tsunami generated by a horizontal motion of a sloping bottom. Bull Earthq Res Inst Univ Tokyo 57:239–262Google Scholar
  16. Johnson JM (1999) Heterogeneous coupling along Alaska-Aleutians and interred from tsunami, seismic, and geodetic inversions. Adv Geophys 39:1–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Moran K, Austin JA, Tappin DR (2005) Survey presents broad approach to tsunami studies. Trans EOS, AGU 86:430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Merrifield MA et al. (2005) Tide gauge observations of the Indian ocean tsunami, December 26, 2004. Geophy Res Lett 32:L09603. doi:10.1029/2005GL022610Google Scholar
  19. Okada Y (1985) Surface deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space. Bull Scismol Soc Am 75:1135–1154Google Scholar
  20. Satake K (1994) Mechanism of the 1992 Nicargua tsunami earthquake. Geophys Res Lett 21:2519–2522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Satake K (1995) Linear and nonlinear computations of the 1992 Nicaragua earthquake tsunami. PAGEOPH 144:455–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Song YT (2007) Detecting tsunami genesis and scales directly from coastal GPS stations. Geophy Res Lett 34. doi:10.1029/2007GL031681Google Scholar
  23. Song YT et al. (2005) The 26 December 2004 tsunami source estimated from satellite radar altimetry and seismic waves. Geophys Res Lett 23. doi:10.1029/2005GL023683Google Scholar
  24. Song YT et al. (2008) The role of horizontal impulses of the faulting continental slope in generating the 26 December 2004 tsunami. Ocean Modell. doi:10.1016/j.ocemod.2007.10.007Google Scholar
  25. Tanioka Y, Satake K (1996) Tsunami generation by horizontal displacement of ocean bottom. Geophy Res Lett 23(8):861–864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Titov VV et al. (2005) The global reach of the 26 December 2004 Sumatra tsunami. Science 309:2045–2048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tuck EO, L-S Hwang (1972) Long wave generation on a sloping beach. J Fluid Mech 51:449–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Vennard JK, Street RL (1982) Elementary fluid mechanics, 6th edn. John Willey & Sons, New York, p 689Google Scholar
  29. Vigny C et al. (2005) Insight into 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake from GPS measurements in Southeast Asia. Nature 436:201–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Jet Propulsion LaboratoryCalifornia Institute of TechnologyPasadenaUSA
  2. 2.Goddard Space Flight Center, National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationGreenbeltUSA

Personalised recommendations