Representing, Proving and Sharing Trustworthiness of Web Resources Using Veracity

  • Grégoire Burel
  • Amparo E. Cano
  • Matthew Rowe
  • Alfonso Sosa
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6317)


The World Wide Web has evolved into a distributed network of web applications facilitating the publication of information on a large scale. Judging whether such information can be trusted is a difficult task for humans, often leading to blind trust. In this paper we present a model and the corresponding veracity ontology which allows trust to be placed in web content by web agents. Our approach differs from current work by allowing the trustworthiness of web content to be securely distributed across arbitrary domains and asserted through the provision of machine-readable proofs (i.e. by citing another piece of information, or stating the credentials of the user/agent). We provide a detailed scenario as motivation for our work and demonstrate how the ontology can be used.


Personal Knowledge Information Provenance Trust Decision Confidence Property Content Trust 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Chesney, T.: An empirical examination of wikipedias credibility. First Monday 11(11) (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gil, Y., Artz, D.: Towards content trust of web resources. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 5(4), 227–239 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Artz, D., Gil, Y.: A survey of trust in computer science and the semantic web. Web Semantics 5(2), 58–71 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Golbeck, J., Hendler, J.: Accuracy of metrics for inferring trust and reputation in semantic web-based social networks. In: Motta, E., Shadbolt, N.R., Stutt, A., Gibbins, N. (eds.) EKAW 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3257, pp. 116–131. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ziegler, C., Lausen, G.: Spreading activation models for trust propagation. In: Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Conference on e-Technology, e-Commerce and e-Service (EEE 2004), pp. 83–97. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Heath, T., Motta, E., Petre, M.: Computing word-of-mouth trust relationships in social networks from semantic web and web 2.0 data sources. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Bridging the Gap between Semantic Web and Web (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gil, Y., Ratnakar, V.: Trusting information sources one citizen at a time. In: Horrocks, I., Hendler, J. (eds.) ISWC 2002. LNCS, vol. 2342, pp. 162–176. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hartig, O., Zhao, J.: Using Web Data Provenance for Quality Assessment. In: SWPM (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Golbeck, J., Hendler, J.: Inferring binary trust relationships in web-based social networks. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. 6(4), 497–529 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Carroll, J.J., Bizer, C., Hayes, P., Stickler, P.: Named graphs, provenance and trust. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on World Wide Web, Chiba, Japan, pp. 613–622. ACM, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    McGuinness, D.L., Ding, L., da Silva, P.P., Chang, C.: Pml 2: A modular explanation interlingua. In: Proceedings of AAAI, vol. 7 (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Grégoire Burel
    • 1
  • Amparo E. Cano
    • 1
  • Matthew Rowe
    • 1
  • Alfonso Sosa
    • 1
  1. 1.Oak Group, Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations