Specification Patent Management for Web Application Platform Ecosystem

  • Yoshiaki Fukami
  • Masao Isshiki
  • Hideaki Takeda
  • Ikki Ohmukai
  • Jiro Kokuryo
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 113)


Diversified usage of web applications has encouraged disintegration of web platform into management of identification and applications. Users make use of various kinds of data linked to their identity with multiple applications on certain social web platforms such as Facebook or MySpace. There has emerged competition among web application platforms. Platformers can design relationship with developers by controlling patent of their own specification and adopt open technologies developed external organizations. Platformers choose a way to open according to feature of the specification and their position. Patent management of specification come to be a key success factor to build competitive web application platforms. Each way to attract external developers such as standardization, open source has not discussed and analyzed all together.


Data Resource International Standard Organization Proprietary Software Patent Policy Patent Management 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    R.S.S.A. Board: RSS 2.0 Specification. RSS at Harvard Law 30 (2005) Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Facebook: Facebook Platform Launches with 65 Developer Partners and Over 85 Applications for Facebook (2007),
  3. 3.
    Riefler, B.: The Composition of Working Groups in Industry-Specific Standardization Organization. In: Discussion Paper Series from the Institute of Economics and Law, University of Stuttgart (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eisenmann, T., Parker, G., Van Alstyne, M.: Strategies for two-sided markets. Harvard Business Review 84(10), 92 (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Huston, L., Sakkab, N.: Connect and develop. Harvard Business Review 84(3), 58–66 (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Recordon, D., Reed, D.: OpenID 2.0: a platform for user-centric identity management. In: Proceedings of the Second ACM Workshop on Digital Identity Management, pp. 11–16. ACM, New York (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    OAuth Core Workgroup: OAuth Core 1.0 (2007),
  8. 8.
    Hammer-Lahav, E.: Explaining OAuth (2007),
  9. 9.
    Khare, R., Celik, T.: Microformats: a pragmatic path to the semantic web. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 865–866. ACM, New York (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jakobs, K.: Information technology standards, standards setting and standards research. In: Proceedings of Cotswolds Conference, Stanhope Center for Communication Policy Research, pp. 8–9 (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yoshiaki Fukami
    • 1
  • Masao Isshiki
    • 1
  • Hideaki Takeda
    • 2
  • Ikki Ohmukai
    • 2
  • Jiro Kokuryo
    • 3
  1. 1.Graduate School of Media and GovernanceKeio UniversityEndo Fujisawa-cityJapan
  2. 2.National Institute of InformaticsTokyoJapan
  3. 3.Faculty of Policy ManagementKeio UniversityEndo Fujisawa-cityJapan

Personalised recommendations