Prediction of Business Process Model Quality Based on Structural Metrics

  • Laura Sánchez-González
  • Félix García
  • Jan Mendling
  • Francisco Ruiz
  • Mario Piattini
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6412)

Abstract

The quality of business process models is an increasing concern as enterprise-wide modelling initiatives have to rely heavily on non-expert modellers. Quality in this context can be directly related to the actual usage of these process models, in particular to their understandability and modifiability. Since these attributes of a model can only be assessed a posteriori, it is of central importance for quality management to identify significant predictors for them. A variety of structural metrics have recently been proposed, which are tailored to approximate these usage characteristics. In this paper, we address a gap in terms of validation for metrics regarding understandability and modifiability. Our results demonstrate the predictive power of these metrics. These findings have strong implications for the design of modelling guidelines.

Keywords

Business process measurement correlation analysis regression analysis BPMN 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Rosemann, M.: Potential pitfalls of process modeling: part a. Business process Management Journal 12(2), 249–254 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    ISO/IEC, ISO Standard 9000-2000: Quality Management Systems: Fundamentals and Vocabulary (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Moody, D.: Theoretical and practical issues in evaluating the quality of conceptual models: current state and future directions. Data and Knowledge Engineering 55, 243–276 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zelkowitz, M., Wallace, D.: Esperimental models for validating technology. IEEE Computer, Computing practices (1998)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    ISO/IEC, 9126-1, Software engineering - product quality - Part 1: Quality Model (2001)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sánchez, L., García, F., Ruiz, F., Piattini, M.: Measurement in Business Processes: a Systematic Review. Business process Management Journal 16(1), 114–134 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mendling, J.: Metrics for Process Models: Empirical Foundations of Verification, Error Prediction, and Guidelines for Correctness. Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    OMG. Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN), Final Adopted Specification (2006), http://www.omg.org/bpm
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
    Foss, T., Stensrud, E., Kitchenham, B., Myrtveit, I.: A Simulation Study of the Model Evaluation Criterion MMRE. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 29, 985–995 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laura Sánchez-González
    • 1
  • Félix García
    • 1
  • Jan Mendling
    • 2
  • Francisco Ruiz
    • 1
  • Mario Piattini
    • 1
  1. 1.Alarcos Research Group, TSI DepartmentUniversity of Castilla La ManchaCiudad RealSpain
  2. 2.Humboldt-Universität zu BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations