Towards Topic-Based Trust in Social Networks

  • Tomáš Knap
  • Irena Mlýnková
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6406)

Abstract

The vast majority of applications consider generic notion of trust of a person to others, which is not restricted to any particular context or situation. Motivated by the financial scenario consuming data from distributed sources on the Web, we argue that we (as information consumers) cannot trust the information publishers or authors in general, however, only regarding the particular topics of the consumed data sources. To enable the so-called topic-based trust between users, we (1) propose a mechanism to persist the topic-based trust in a FOAF social network, (2) survey the topic hierarchies suitable for classifying the topics used in the trust model, and (3) propose an algorithm to compute trust with respect to the particular topic.

Keywords

Trust Trust model Social network 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Breslin, J., et al.: Finding Experts Using Internet-Based Discussions in Online Communities and Associated Social Networks. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Expert Finder Workshop at Knowledge Web General Assembly (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Golbeck, J., Parsia, B., Hendler, J.: Trust Networks on the Semantic Web. In: Proceedings of Cooperative Information Agents, Finland (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Suchanek, F.M., Kasneci, G., Weikum, G.: Yago – A Core of Semantic Knowledge. In: 16th International World Wide Web Conference (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Josang, A., Ismail, R., Boyd, C.: A Survey of Trust and Reputation Systems for Online Service Provisions. Decision Support Systems 43(2), 618–644 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bentivogli, L., Forner, P., Magnini, B., Pianta, E.: Revising WordNet Domains Hierarchy: Semantics, Coverage, and Balancing. In: Proceedings of COLING 2004 Workshop on Multilingual Linguistic Resources, Switzerland, pp. 101–108 (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bizer, C., Heath, T., Berners-Lee, T.: Linked Data – The Story So Far. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems, IJSWIS (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Boyd-Graber, J., Fellbaum, C., Osherson, D., Schapire, R.: Adding Dense, Weighted Connections to WORDNET. In: Proceedings of the Global WordNet Conference (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Golbeck, J.: Computing and Applying Trust in Web-based Social Networks. Ph.D. Dissertation (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Newman, M.: Models of the small world. J. Stat. Phys. 101, 819–841 (2000)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Milgram, S.: The small word problem. Psychology Today 2, 60–67 (1967)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Golbeck, J.: Trust and Nuanced Profile Similarity in Online Social Networks. ACM Transactions on the Web (2009) (in press)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Miller, G.A.: WordNet: A Lexical Database for English. Communications of the ACM 38(11), 39–41 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Watts, D.: Small Worlds: The Dynamics of Networks between Order and Randomness. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1999)MATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    McKnight, D.H., Chervany, N.L.: The Meanings of Trust. Technical Report MISRC Working Paper Series 96-04, University of Minnesota (1996)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Page, L., Brin, S., Motwani, R., Winograd, T.: The pagerank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web. Technical report, Stanford Digital Library Technologies Project (1998)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kamvar, S.D., Schlosser, M.T., Garcia-Molina, H.: The eigentrust algorithm for reputation management in P2P networks. In: WWW 2003: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 640–651 (2003)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Artz, D., Gil, Y.: A Survey of Trust in Computer Science and the Semantic Web. Journal of Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web (2007)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Moreau, L.: The Foundation for Provenance on the Web. Submitted to Foundations and Trends in Web Science (2009)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Aleman-Meza, B., et al.: Ranking Complex Relationships on the Semantic Web. IEEE Internet Computing 9(3) (2005)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Noy, N., Rector, A. (eds.): Defining N-ary Relations on the Semantic Web. Information W3C Working Group Note (2006)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Marsh, C.: Formalising Trust as a Computational Concept. Ph.D. Thesis (1994)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ziegler, C., Lausen, G.: Propagation Models for Trust and Distrust in Social Networks. Information Systems Frontiers 7(4-5), 337–358 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Backett, D. (ed.): RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised). W3C Recommendation (2004)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nekola, J.C., White, P.S.: The distance decay of similarity in biogeography and ecology. Journal of Biogeography 26, 867–878 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tomáš Knap
    • 1
  • Irena Mlýnková
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Mathematics and PhysicsCharles University in PragueCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations