Theory and Practice Meets in Industrial Process Design -Educational Perspective-

  • Heli Aramo-Immonen
  • Tarja Toikka
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 112)

Abstract

Software engineer should see himself as a business process designer in enterprise resource planning system (ERP) re-engineering project. Software engineers and managers should have design dialogue. The objective of this paper is to discuss the motives to study the design research in connection of management education in order to envision and understand the soft human issues in the management context. Second goal is to develop means of practicing social skills between designers and managers. This article explores the affective components of design thinking in industrial management domain. In the conceptual part of this paper are discussed concepts of network and project economy, creativity, communication, use of metaphors, and design thinking. Finally is introduced empirical research plan and first empirical results from design method experiments among the multi-disciplined groups of the master-level students of industrial engineering and management and software engineering.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Andropoulos, C., Gotsi, M.: Lessons from creative culture. Design Management Review (April 2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aramo-Immonen, H., Vanharanta, H.: Project Management - The Task of Holistic Systems Thinking. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing 19(6), 582–600 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aramo-Immonen, H., Kantola, J., Vanharanta, H., Karwowski, W.: Mastering Qualitative Factors of Uncertainty in Mega Projects. In: Proceedings of 5th Annual International Conference on European Academy of Management, EURAM 2005, Munich, Germany (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Argyris, C.: How Learning and Reasoning Processes affect Organizational Change. In: Goodman, P.S. Associates, (eds.) Change in Organizations, New Perspectives on Theory, Research, and Practice, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (1982)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Artto, K.: Voiko oppi kaataa ojaan? [Can learning turn you to alley?] Projektitoiminta (January 2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brewer, J., Hunter, A.: Multimethod Research. A Synthesis of Styles. Sage, Newbury Park (1989)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Biggs, M.A.R.: Modelling Experiential Knowledge for Research. In: Mäkelä, M., Routarinne, S. (eds.) The Art of Research: Practice in Research of Art and Design. UIAH, Helsinki (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brown, T.: Design Thinking thoughts by Tim Brown, Blog (2009), http://designthinking.ideo.com/?p=49
  9. 9.
    Brown, T.: Talks Tim Brown on creativity and play. TED Ideas worth spreading (2008), http://www.ted.com/talks/tim_brown_on_creativity_and_play.html
  10. 10.
    Checkland, P.B., Scholes, P.: Soft systems Methodology in Action. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (1990)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Churchland, P.S.: Brain-Wise - Studies in Neurophilosophy. A Bradford book. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2002)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Creswell, J.W., Plano, C.V.: Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Sage, London (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Denzin, N.K.: The Research Act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, NY (1978)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ekvall, G., Arvonen, J.: Leadership styles and organizational climate for creativity: Some findings in one company. Swedish Council for Management and Organizational Behavior, Stockholm (1984)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ekvall, G., Arvonen, J., Waldenstrom-Lindblad, I.: Creative organizational climate: Construction and validation of a measuring instrument. Swedish Council for Management and Organizational Behavior, Stockholm (1983)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    EURAM: EURAM conference pages (2010), http://www.euram2010.org
  17. 17.
    Feldman, J., Narayanan, S.: Embodied meaning in a neural theory of language. Brain and Language 89(2), 385–392 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Flood, R.L., Carson, E.: Dealing with complexity: An Introduction to the Theory and Application of Systems Science. Plenum Press, N.Y (1988)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Florida, R.: Luovan luokan pako: uusi globaali kilpailu kyvyistä. Talentum, Helsinki (2006)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Garvin, D.A.: The Processes of Organization and Management. Sloan management review 39(4), 33–50 (1998)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Goatly, A.: The language of metaphors. Routledge, London (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Goatly, A.: Humans, Animals, and Metaphors. Society and Animals 1(14), 15–37 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hautamäki, A.: Kestävä innovointi, Innovaatiopolitiikka uusien haasteiden edessä. Sitran Raportti 79, Helsinki, pp. 4–30 (2008), www.tieke.fi/mp/db/file../Antti_Hautamaki_080314.pdf
  24. 24.
    Jackson, C.M.: Systems Thinking: Creative Holism for Managers. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., West Sussex (2004)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jackson, P., Klobas, J.: Building knowledge in projects: A practical application of social constructivism to information systems development. International Journal of Project Management 26(4), 329–337 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kelly, K.: New Rules for the Wired Economy: 10 Radical Strategies for a Connected World. Benguin Books Ltd., New York (1998)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kuitunen, K.: Klassinen johtamisteoria (2005), www.taloustieteet.oulu.fi/opiskelu/dokumentit/johdorg1.pdf
  28. 28.
    Kähkönen, K.: Uusi menestys luodaan projekteissa. Helsingin Sanomat (26.7.2009)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lakoff, G., Johnson, M.: Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lawson, B.: How Designers Think. Architectural Press, Oxford (1980/1997)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lawson, B.: What Designers Know. Architectural Press, Oxford (2004)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lygonis, D.S.C.: Keynote in the Creative mind-seminar, Tampere (21. 4. 2009)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Miller, J.G.: Living Systems. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York (1978)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mäkelä, M., Routarinne, S.: Connecting Different Practices. The Art of Research, Research Practices in Art and Design, University of Art and design Helsinki (2006)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Palonen, T.: Shared Knowledge and the Web of Relationships. Turku Unoversity Press (2003)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pitkänen, M.H.: Towards Human centered project management. IPMA Scientific Research Papers. The Human Side of Projects in Modern Business. Project Management Association Finland (2009)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Porter, M.E.: Competitive Advantage, Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. The Free press, New York (1985)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Prather, C.W.: How Is Your Climate for Innovation? R&D Innovator 5(5), 5–6 (1996)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Schumak, K.: Conversations with the self-knowledge creation for designing. Kybernetes 37(9/10), 1515–1528 (2007)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Schön, D.: The Reflective Practitioner. Avebury, Aldershot (1991)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Slack, N., Chambers, S., Johnston, R.: Operations Management, 6th edn. Pearson, Harlow (2010)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Standford University: We believe great innovators and leaders need to be great design thinkers (2009), http://www.stanford.edu/group/dschool/big_picture/our_vision.html
  43. 43.
    Taxén, L.: Using Activity Domain Theory for Managing Complex Systems. Information Science reference, NY (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Thurston, M.: DMI Paris, Design/Management Europe 12 (Tarja Toikka participated), Keynote by Maureen Thurston: At the Nexus of a New Design Dialectic: How Designers are Uniquely Skilled to be the Definitive Link between Innovation and Management Transformation (2008)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Tuomikoski, P.: Taide ja ihminen, Helsinki, pp. 119–126 (1987)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Von Brandenburg, C.: Kuvataide työhyvinvoinnin ja tykytoiminnan tukena. Synnyt/Origins 2/2009 (2003), http://arted.uiah.fi/synnyt/2_2009/cecilia_von_brandenburg.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heli Aramo-Immonen
    • 1
  • Tarja Toikka
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Industrial Management and EngineeringTampere University of TechnologyPoriFinland
  2. 2.Faculty of Art and media PoriAalto University School of Art and DesignPoriFinland

Personalised recommendations