An Approach to Metadata Generation for Learning Objects

  • Victor Menendez D.
  • Alfredo Zapata G.
  • Christian Vidal C.
  • Alejandra Segura N.
  • Manuel Prieto M.
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 111)

Abstract

Metadata describe instructional resources and define their nature and use. Metadata are required to guarantee reusability and interchange of instructional resources into e-Learning systems. However, fulfilment of large metadata attributes is a hard and complex task for almost all LO developers. As a consequence many mistakes are made. This can cause the impoverishment of data quality in indexing, searching and recovering process. We propose a methodology to build Learning Objects from digital resources. The first phase includes automatic preprocessing of resources using techniques from information retrieval. Initial metadata obtained in this first phase are then used to search similar LO to propose missed metadata. The second phase considers assisted activities that merge computer advice with human decisions. Suggestions are based on metadata of similar Learning Object using fuzzy logic theory.

Keywords

Metadata Generation Learning Object Methodology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Cechinel, C., Sanchez-Alonso, S., Sicilia, M.A.: Empirical Analysis of Errors on Human-Generated Learning Objects Metadata. In: Proceedings Metadata and Semantic Research Third International Conference (MTSR 2009), Milan, Italy, pp. 60–70 (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Farrell, R.G., Liburd, S.D., Thomas, J.C.: Dynamic assembly of learning objects. In: Proceedings of the 13th International World Wide Web Conference on Alternate Track Papers & Posters, New York, NY, USA, pp. 162–169 (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Greenberg, J.: Metadata extraction and harvesting: A comparison of two automatic metadata generation applications. Journal of Internet Cataloging: The International Quarterly of Digital Organization, Classification and Access 6(4), 58–82 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hamers, L., Hemeryck, Y., Herweyers, G., Janssen, M., Keters, H., Rousseau, R., Vanhoutte, A.: Similarity measures in scientometric research. The Jaccard Index Versus Salton’s Cosine Formula 25(3), 315–318 (1989)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    IEEE Standard for Learning Object Metadata (2002), http://ltsc.ieee.org/wg12/
  6. 6.
    Ochoa, X., Cardinaels, K., Meire, M., Duval, E.: Frameworks for the Automatic Indexation of Learning Management Systems Content into Learning Object Repositories. In: Kommers, P., Richards, G. (eds.) Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2005, Montreal, Canada, pp. 1407–1414 (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pedersen, T., Patwardhan, S., Michelizzi, J.: WordNet: Similarity: measuring the relatedness of concepts. In: Demonstration Papers at HLT-NAACL 2004 on XX (HLT-NAACL 2004). Association for Computational Linguistics, Boston (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Polsani, P.: Use and Abuse of Reusable Learning Objects. Journal of Digital Information 3(4), 1–10 (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Prieto, M.E., Menendez, V., Segura, A., Vidal, C.: A Recommender System Architecture for Instructional Engineering. In: Lytras, M.D., et al. (eds.) WSKS 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5288, pp. 314–321. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    SCORM: Sharable Course Object Reference Model (2004), http://adlnet.org/
  11. 11.
    Sicilia, M.A., Garcia, E.: On the Concepts of Usability and Reusability of Learning Objects. International Review of Open and Distance Learning 4(2) (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Victor Menendez D.
    • 1
  • Alfredo Zapata G.
    • 1
  • Christian Vidal C.
    • 2
  • Alejandra Segura N.
    • 2
  • Manuel Prieto M.
    • 3
  1. 1.Univ. Autónoma de YucatánMéridaMéxico
  2. 2.Universidad del Bio-BioConcepciónChile
  3. 3.Univ. de Castilla-La ManchaCiudad RealSpain

Personalised recommendations