Authoring Business Rules Grounded in OWL Ontologies

  • Amina Chniti
  • Sylvain Dehors
  • Patrick Albert
  • Jean Charlet
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6403)

Abstract

This paper describes an approach in the double context of business rules and techniques of the semantic web, the ontologies. This approach consists of enabling the use of business rules to automate the decisions on domains which semantic is formalized with an ontological language. Our main objective is to enable business users to edit, manage and execute business rules grounded in ontologies without resorting to an expert. The implementation is based on the Business Rule Management System (BRMS) IBM WebSphere ILOG JRules.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    OWL, Ontology Web Language (2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/
  2. 2.
    Resource Description Framework, RDF (2004), http://www.w3.org/RDF/
  3. 3.
    Antoniou, G., Damasio, C.V., Grosof, B., Horrocks, I., Kifer, M., Maluszynski, J., Patel-Schneider, P.F.: Combining rules and ontologies: A survey. Technical Report IST506779/Linköping/I3-D3/D/PU/a1, Linköping University (2004), http://rewerse.net/publications/
  4. 4.
    Eiter, T., Ianni, G., Polleres, A., Schindlauer, R., Tompits, H.: Reasoning with rules and ontologies. In: Barahona, P., Bry, F., Franconi, E., Henze, N., Sattler, U. (eds.) Reasoning Web 2006. LNCS, vol. 4126, pp. 93–127. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Del Fabro, M.D., Albert, P., Bézivin, J., Jouault, F.: Achieving rule interoperability using chains of model transformations. In: Paige, R.F. (ed.) ICMT 2009. LNCS, vol. 5563, pp. 249–259. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    El Ghali, A., Dehors, S., Krof, R., Levy, F., Guisse, A.: D2.1 basic integration of ontology and business rule authoring technology and basic dependency management, ontorule project delivrable (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Grosof, B., Horrocks, I.: Description logic programs combining logic programs with description logic. In: WWW, pp. 48–57 (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kalyanpur, A., Jimenez, D., Battle, S., Padget, J.: Automatic mapping of OWL ontologies into Java. In: Maurer, F., Ruhe, G. (eds.) Proc. of the Sixteenth International Conference on Software Engineering & Knowledge Engineering, SEKE 2004 (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Parsia, B., Sirin, E., Cuenca Grau, B., Ruckhaus, E., Hewlett, D.: Cautiously approaching swrl. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sowa, J.F.: Knowledge representation: Logical, philosophical, and computational foundations (2000)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amina Chniti
    • 1
    • 2
  • Sylvain Dehors
    • 1
  • Patrick Albert
    • 1
  • Jean Charlet
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.IBMUSA
  2. 2.INSERM UMRS 872, Eq 20, 15, Rue de l’école de médecineParisFrance
  3. 3.AP-HPParisFrance

Personalised recommendations