Advertisement

Systematic Translation Rules from astd to Event-B

  • Jérémy Milhau
  • Marc Frappier
  • Frédéric Gervais
  • Régine Laleau
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6396)

Abstract

This article presents a set of translation rules to generate Event-B machines from process-algebra based specification languages such as astd. Illustrated by a case study, it details the rules and the process of the translation. The ultimate goal of this systematic translation is to take advantage of Rodin, the Event-B platform to perform proofs, animation and model-checking over the translated specification.

Keywords

Process algebra Translation rules Systematic translation astd Event-B 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Abrial, J.R.: The B-Book: Assigning Programs to Meanings. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abrial, J.R.: Modeling in Event-B. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Abrial, J.R., Butler, M., Hallerstede, S., Voisin, L.: An open extensible tool environment for Event-B. In: Liu, Z., He, J. (eds.) ICFEM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4260, pp. 588–605. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Butler, M.: csp2b: A practical approach to combining CSP and b. Formal Aspects of Computing 12(3), 182–198 (2000)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eclipse Consortium: Eclipse graphical modeling framework (gmf), http://www.eclipse.org/modeling/gmp/?project=gmf
  6. 6.
    Fraikin, B., Frappier, M.: Efficient symbolic computation of process expressions. Science of Computer Programming (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fraikin, B., et al.: Synthesizing information systems: the apis project. In: Rolland, C., Pastor, O., Cavarero, J.L. (eds.) First International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS), Ouarzazate, Morocco, p. 12 (April 2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Frappier, M., Gervais, F., Laleau, R., Fraikin, B., St-Denis, R.: Extending statecharts with process algebra operators. Innovations in Systems and Software Engineering 4(3), 285–292 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Frappier, M., St-Denis, R.: eb 3: an entity-based black-box specification method for information systems. Software and System Modeling 2(2), 134–149 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Harel, D.: Statecharts: A visual formalism for complex systems. Science of computer programming 8(3), 231–274 (1987)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hoare, C.A.R.: CSP–Communicating Sequential Processes. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1985)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Leuschel, M., Butler, M.: ProB: A model checker for b. In: Araki, K., Gnesi, S., Mandrioli, D. (eds.) FME 2003. LNCS, vol. 2805, pp. 855–874. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rumbaugh, J., Jacobson, I., Booch, G.: The unified modeling language. University Video Communications (1996)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Said, M.Y., Butler, M., Snook, C.: Language and tool support for class and state machine refinement in UML-B. In: Cavalcanti, A., Dams, D.R. (eds.) FM 2009. LNCS, vol. 5850, pp. 579–595. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Salabert, K., Milhau, J., et al.: iASTD: un interpréteur pour les ASTD. In: Atelier Approches Formelles dans l’Assistance au Développement de Logiciels (AFADL 2010), Actes AFADL, Poitiers, France, pp. 3–6 (June 9-11, 2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sekerinski, E.: Verifying Statecharts with State Invariants. In: 13th IEEE International Conference on Engineering of Complex Computer Systems, pp. 7–14. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sekerinski, E., Zurob, R.: Translating statecharts to b. In: Butler, M., Petre, L., Sere, K. (eds.) IFM 2002. LNCS, vol. 2335, pp. 128–144. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Snook, C., Butler, M.: UML-B: Formal modeling and design aided by UML. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM) 15(1), 122 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Van Der Aalst, W.M.P.: The application of Petri nets to workflow management. The Journal of Circuits, Systems and Computers 8(1), 21–66 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jérémy Milhau
    • 1
    • 2
  • Marc Frappier
    • 1
  • Frédéric Gervais
    • 2
  • Régine Laleau
    • 2
  1. 1.GRIL, Département InformatiqueUniversité de SherbrookeQuébecCanada
  2. 2.Département Informatique, Route HurtaultUniversité Paris-Est, LACL, IUT Sénart FontainebleauFontainebleauFrance

Personalised recommendations