Rational Communication and Affordable Natural Language Interaction for Ambient Environments

  • Kristiina Jokinen
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6392)

Abstract

This paper discusses rational interaction as a methodology for designing and implementing dialogue management in ambient environments. It is assumed that natural (multimodal) language communication is the most intuitive way of interaction, and most suitable when the interlocutors are involved in open-ended activities that concern negotiations and planning. The paper discusses aspects that support this hypothesis by focussing especially on how interlocutors build shared context through natural language, and create social bonds through affective communication. Following the design guidelines for interactive artefacts, it is proposed that natural language provides human-computer systems with an interface which is affordable: it readily suggests the appropriate ways to use the interface.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Allwood, J.: An Activity Based Approach to Pragmatics. Gothenburg Paper. In: Theoretical Linguistics 76, Dept. of Linguistic, Göteborg University (2000)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arbib, M.: The evolving mirror system: A neural basis for language readiness. In: Christiansen, M., Kirby, S. (eds.) Language evolution, pp. 182–200. Oxford UP, Oxford (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bunt, H.C.: A framework for dialogue act specification. In: Fourth Workshop on Multimodal Semantic Representation (ACL-SIGSEM and ISO TC37/SC4), Tilburg (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cassell, J., Sullivan, J., Prevost, S., Churchill, E. (eds.): Embodied Conversational Agents. MIT Press, Cambridge (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Clark, H.H., Schaefer, E.F.: Contributing to Discourse. Cog. Sci. 13, 259–294 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gibson, J.: The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin, Boston (1979)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gorin, A.L., Riccardi, G., Wright, J.H.: How I Help You? Speech Communication 23(1-2), 113–127 (1997)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jokinen, K.: Constructive Dialogue Modelling – Speech Interaction and Rational Agents. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (2009a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jokinen, K.: Gesturing in Alignment and Conversational Activity. In: Proceedings of the Pacific Linguistic Conference, Sapporo, Japan (2009b)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jokinen, K., Hurtig, T.: User Expectations and Real Experience on a Multimodal Interactive System. In: Proceedings of Interspeech-2006, Pittsburgh, US (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Norman, D.A.: The psychology of everyday things. Basic Books, New York (1988)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pickering, M., Garrod, S.: Towards a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27, 169–226 (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sadek, D., Bretier, P., Panaget, F.: ARTIMIS: Natural dialogue meets rational agency. In: Proceedings of IJCAI 1997, pp. 1030–1035 (1997)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tomasello, M.: First verbs: A case study of early grammatical development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Traum, D.: Computational models of grounding in collaborative systems. In: Working Papers of the AAAI Fall Symposium on Psychological Models of Communication in Collaborative Systems, pp. 124–131. AAAI, Menlo Park (1999)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Weiser, M.: The Computer for the Twenty-First Century. Sci. Am., 94–104 (1991)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kristiina Jokinen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Speech SciencesUniversity of HelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations