Advertisement

From ‘Balancers’ to ‘Integrators’? Young Professionals’ Talk About ‘Work’ and the Rest of ‘Life’ in the UK

What Does ‘Work-Life Balance’ (WLB) Mean to Today’s Generation of University Graduates and Future Professionals and What Support Do They Expect?
  • Uracha Chatrakul Na Ayudhya
  • Suzan Lewis
Chapter

Abstract

The topic of WLB has gained wide academic and public attention in recent times. However, an emergent critical perspective signifies the problematic nature of the WLB discourse (e.g., Fleetwood, 2007; Lewis et al., 2007). One problem is that much of the current work-life debates and research tend to focus on workers who have caring and/or other family responsibilities, thereby confining our understanding of work and personal life experiences to a particular demographic cohort and phase in the life course. Nevertheless, the WLB discourse is part of a wider context in which today’s young people, not yet in the workforce, develop impressions of what employment will entail.

Keywords

Young People Personal Life Individual Choice Psychological Contract Future Employer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bailyn L (2006) Breaking the mold. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
  2. Brannen J, Lewis S, Nilsen A, Smithson J (eds) (2002) Young europeans. Work and family: futures in transition. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Casper WJ, Weltman D, Kwesiga E (2007) Beyond family-friendly: the construct and measurement of singles-friendly work culture. J Vocat Behav 70:478–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Crompton R, Lewis S, Lyonette C (2007) Continuities, change and transformations. In Crompton R, Lewis S, Lyonette C (eds) Women, men, work, and family in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, pp 230–244Google Scholar
  5. DfEE (Department for Education and Employment) (2000) Work-life balance 2000: Baseline study of work-life balance practices in Great Britain. Summary Report. DfEE, SudburyGoogle Scholar
  6. Dight C (2008) It’s no longer just about the money. The Times (2008, 18 January). http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/career_and_jobs/graduate_management/article3196809.ece. Accessed 17 Dec 2008
  7. DTI (Department of Trade and Industry) and Scotland Office (2000) Work-life balance the business case. Electronic version. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ + http://www.dti.gov.uk/work-life balance/publications.html. Accessed 8 Nov 2010
  8. Eikhof DR, Warhurst C, Haunschild A (2007) Introduction: what work? What life? What balance?. Empl Relat 29:325–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Families and Work Institute (2004) Generation and gender in the workplace. Families and Work Institute, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  10. Fleetwood S (2007) Re-thinking work-life balance: editor’s introduction. Int J Hum Resour Manage 18:351–359Google Scholar
  11. Gerson K (2004) Understanding work and family through a gender lens. Commun Work Fam 7:163–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Giele JZ, Elder GH (1998) Methods of life course research: qualitative and quantitative approaches. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  13. Holt H, Lewis S (in press) ‘You can stand on your head and you still end up with lower pay’: gliding segregation and gendered work practices in two Danish workplaces. Gender Work OrganGoogle Scholar
  14. Kamenou N (2008) Reconsidering work-life balance debates: challenging limited understandings of the ‘life’ component in the context of ethnic minority women’s experiences. Br J Manage 19:99–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kelliher C, Anderson D (2009) Doing more with less? Flexible working practices and the intensification of work. Hum Relat 63:83–106Google Scholar
  16. Kitzinger J (1995) Introducing focus groups. Br Med J 311:299–302Google Scholar
  17. Lewis S (2009). Flexible working policies, gender and culture change. In European Commission Directorate-General for Research (ed) Women in science and technology. Creating sustainable careers. European Communities, Luxemburg, pp 40–48.Google Scholar
  18. Lewis S, Cooper CL (2005) Work- life integration. Case studies of organisational change. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  19. Lewis S, Haas L (2005) Work-life integration and social policy: a social justice theory and gender equity approach to work and family. In Kossek EE, Lambert SJ (eds) Work and life integration: organizational, cultural, and individual perspectives. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp 349–371Google Scholar
  20. Lewis S, Smithson J (2001) Sense of entitlement to support for the reconciliation of employment and family life. Hum Relat 54:1455–1481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lewis S, Smithson J, Brannen J (1999) Young Europeans’ orientations to families and work. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 562:83–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lewis S, Smithson J, Kugelberg C (2002) Into work: Job insecurity and changing psychological contracts. In Brannen J, Lewis S, Nilsen A, Smithson J (eds) Young Europeans, work and family: futures in transition. Routledge, London, pp 69–88Google Scholar
  23. Lewis S, Gambles R, Rapoport R (2007) The constraints of a ‘work-life balance’ approach: an international perspective. Int J Hum Resour Manage 18:360–373Google Scholar
  24. Loughlin C, Barling J (2001) Young workers’ work values, attitudes, and behaviours. J Occup Organ Psychol 74:543–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mickel A, Dallimore E (2009) Life-quality decisions: tension management strategies used by individuals when making trade-offs. Hum Relat 62:627–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pitt-Catsouphes M, Smyer MA (2007) The 21st century multi-generational workplace. Center Aging Work Issue Brief 09:1–12Google Scholar
  27. Rapoport R, Bailyn L, Fletcher JK, Pruitt BH (2002) Beyond work/family balance: advancing gender equity and workplace performance. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CAGoogle Scholar
  28. Rousseau DM, Wade-Benzoni KA (1995) Changing individual-organization attachments: a two-way street. In Howard A (ed) The changing nature of work. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, pp 290–321Google Scholar
  29. Smithson J, Lewis S (2000) Is job insecurity changing the psychological contract?. Pers Rev 29:680–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Smithson J, Stokoe EH (2005) Discourses of work-life balance: negotiating ‘genderblind’ terms in organizations. Gender Work Organ 12:147–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Smola KW, Sutton CD (2002) Generational differences: Revisiting generational work values for the new millennium. J Organ Behav 23:363–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sturges J (2008) All in a day’s work? Career self-management and the management of the boundary between work and non-work. Hum Resour Manage J 18:118–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sturges J, Guest D (2004) Working to live or living to work? Work/life balance early in the career. Hum Resour Manage J 14:5–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. The Times (2004). Don’t just give me a car – give me a laptop and a free Friday afternoon. The Times. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/classifieds/jobs/article433692.ece?token=null&offset=0&page=1. Accessed on 27 May 2004
  35. The Work-Life Balance Trust & Robertson Cooper Ltd (2002) The graduates’ guide to the best work-life balance employers in Britain. The Work-Life Balance Trust & Robertson Cooper Ltd, Manchester. Accessed 17 December 2008Google Scholar
  36. Tomlinson J (2006) Women’s work-life balance trajectories in the UK: Reformulating choice and constraint in transitions through part-time work across the life-course. Br J Guid Couns 34:365–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Unisys (2004) Young workers demand flexibility as work pressure hits friendships and home life. http://www.unisys.co.uk/about_unisys/news_a_events/05270401uk.htm. Accessed 6 July 2004
  38. Universum (2003) The Universum Graduate Survey 2003 Pan-European Edition. Universum Communications, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  39. Williams L, Jones A (2005) Changing demographics. The Work Foundation, LondonGoogle Scholar
  40. Young MB (1999) Work-family backlash: Begging the question, what’s fair?. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 562:32–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Middlesex University Business SchoolLondonUK

Personalised recommendations