Advertisement

Public Disclosure versus Private Practice: Challenges in Business Process Management (Position Paper)

  • Stacy Hobson
  • Sameer Patil
  • Xuan Liu
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6275)

Abstract

This paper explores the gap between actual work practices and their articulation. Our goal is to bring this gap to the forefront as an important consideration for operational process modeling. Business process models presuppose accurate disclosure of employee work practices. However, the presence of a gap between personal practices and their public disclosure is a challenge for accurately representing the true nature of business operations. We describe a field study of the working practices of a municipal organization where we identified this gap. We then offer several underlying motivations that contribute to the existence of this disparity. These findings hold important implications for global enterprises, and for process modeling efforts in general.

Keywords

Information Sharing Business Process Management Privacy Process Model 

References

  1. 1.
    van der Aalst, W.: Business Process Management: A Personal View. J. Bus. Process Management 10(2), 248–253 (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ackerman, M.S., Cranor, L.F., Reagle, J.: Privacy in e-commerce: Examining User Scenarios and Privacy Preferences. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 1–8. ACM Press, New York (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bellotti, V., Sellen, A.: Design for Privacy in Ubiquitous Computing Environments. In: Proceedings of ECSCW, pp. 77–92. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1993)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gross, R., Acquisti, A.: Information Revelation and Privacy in Online Social Networks. In: Proceedings of the ACM Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society, pp. 71–80. ACM Press, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ackerman, M.S.: The Intellectual Challenge of CSCW: The Gap Between Social Requirements and Technical Feasibility. J. HCI 15, 179–204 (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Miller, S., Weckert, J.: Privacy, the Workplace and the Internet. J. Bus. Ethics 28(3), 255–265 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bellotti, V.: What You Don’t Know Can Hurt You: Privacy in Collaborative Computing. In: Proceedings of HCI and People and Computers XI, pp. 241–261. Springer, London (1996)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Olson, J.S., Grudin, J., Horvitz, E.: Technical Report Number: MSR-TR-2004-138, Microsoft Research (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Olson, J.S., Grudin, J., Horvitz, E.: Towards Understanding Preferences for Sharing and Privacy. In: CHI 2005 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1985–1988. ACM Press, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Borkan, J.M.,, Miller, W.L., Neher, J.O., Cushman, R., Crabtree, B.F.: Evaluating Family Practice Residencies: A New Method for Qualitative Assessment. J. Fam, Med. 29(9), 640–647 (1997)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wight, D.: Boys Thoughts and Talk about Sex in a Working Class Locality of Glasgow. Soc. Review 42(4), 703–737 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schmidt, K.: The Critical Role of Workplace Studies in CSCW. In: Heath, Hindmarsh, Luff (eds.) Workplace Studies: Rediscovering Work Practice and Informing Design. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cassell, J., Bickmore, T.: External Manifestations of Trustworthiness in the Interface. Communications of the ACM 43(12), 50–56 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Panteli, N., Sockalingam, S.: Trust and Conflict within Virtual Inter-organizational Alliances: A Framework for Facilitating Knowledge Sharing. Decision Support Systems 39(4), 599–617 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Adam, O., Hofer, A., Zang, S., Hammer, C., Jerrentrup, M., Leinenbach, S.: A Collaboration Framework for Cross-Enterprise Business Process Management. In: Preproceedings of the 1st INTEROP-ESA 2005, pp. 499–510 (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stacy Hobson
    • 1
  • Sameer Patil
    • 2
  • Xuan Liu
    • 1
  1. 1.IBM T.J. Watson Research CenterHawthorneUSA
  2. 2.Department of InformaticsUniversity of California, IrvineIrvineUSA

Personalised recommendations