Model-to-Metamodel Transformation for the Development of Component-Based Systems

  • Gerd Kainz
  • Christian Buckl
  • Stephan Sommer
  • Alois Knoll
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6395)


Embedded systems are a potential application area for component-based development approaches. They can be assembled from multiple generic components that can either be application components used to realize the application logic or hardware components to provide low level hardware access. The glue code to connect these components is typically implemented using middleware or run-time systems. Nowadays great parts of the system are automatically generated and configured according to application needs by using model driven software development tools. In a model driven development process, three different kinds of developers can be identified: run-time system experts, component developers and application developers. This paper presents a multi-phase approach, which is suited to support all of these experts in an optimal way. Key idea is a multi-phase development process based on model-to-metamodel transformations connecting the different phases. The advantages of this approach are demonstrated in the context of distributed sensor / actuator systems.


Model-to-Metamodel (M2MM) Model-to-Model (M2M)  Model Transformation Component-based Systems Model-Driven Development (MDD) 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Szyperski, C.: Component Software. Addison-Wesley Professional, Reading (November 2002)MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    OMG: Common Object Request Broker Architecture (CORBA/IIOP) Specification Version 3.1. (January 2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stahl, T., Voelter, M.: Model-Driven Software Development: Technology, Engineering, Management, 1st edn. Wiley, Chichester (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Buckl, C., Sommer, S., Scholz, A., Knoll, A., Kemper, A.: Generating a tailored middleware for wireless sensor network applications. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Sensor Networks, Ubiquitous, and Trustworthy Computing, pp. 162–169. IEEE, Los Alamitos (June 2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buckl, C., Sommer, S., Scholz, A., Knoll, A., Kemper, A., Heuer, J., Schmitt, A.: Services to the field: An approach for resource constrained sensor/actor networks. In: 2009 International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops, pp. 476–481. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Herrmannsdoerfer, M., Benz, S., Juergens, E.: Automatability of coupled evolution of metamodels and models in practice. In: Czarnecki, K., Ober, I., Bruel, J.-M., Uhl, A., Völter, M. (eds.) MODELS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5301, pp. 645–659. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Steinberg, D., Budinsky, F., Paternostro, M., Merks, E.: EMF: Eclipse Modeling Framework, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley Professional, Reading (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    OMG: Meta Object Facility (MOF) Core Specification Version 2.0. (January 2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Miller, J., Mukerji, J.: MDA Guide Version 1.0.1. (June 2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brooks, C., Lee, E.A., Liu, X., Neuendorffer, S., Zhao, Y., Zheng, H.: Heterogeneous concurrent modeling and design in Java, vol. 1, Introduction to Ptolemy II. Technical Report UCB/EECS-2008-28, EECS Department, University of California, Berkeley (April 2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bragança, A., Machado, R.J.: Transformation patterns for multi-staged model driven software development. In: SPLC 2008: Proceedings of the 2008 12th International Software Product Line Conference, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 329–338. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Atkinson, C., Kühne, T.: The essence of multilevel metamodeling. In: Gogolla, M., Kobryn, C. (eds.) UML 2001. LNCS, vol. 2185, pp. 19–33. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Winskel, G.: The Formal Semantics of Programming Languages. MIT Press, Cambridge (1993)MATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Morin, B., Perrouin, G., Lahire, P., Barais, O., Vanwormhoudt, G., Jézéquel, J.M.: Weaving variability into domain metamodels. In: Schürr, A., Selic, B. (eds.) MODELS 2009. LNCS, vol. 5795, pp. 690–705. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerd Kainz
    • 1
  • Christian Buckl
    • 1
  • Stephan Sommer
    • 2
  • Alois Knoll
    • 2
  1. 1.fortiss, Cyber-Physical SystemsMunichGermany
  2. 2.Faculty of InformaticsTechnische Universität MünchenGarchingGermany

Personalised recommendations