The Complexity of Integrating Technology Enhanced Learning in Special Math Education – A Case Study
We present a study of integrating an educational game in special math education, to explore challenges faced during the process. The game promotes an unconventional approach supporting students having math difficulties, through visual representations, learn-by-exploration and learn-by-teaching models. Our conclusion is that integration in special education is more challenging than in the main stream counterpart, due to social vulnerability of the students, learning/teaching challenges in content, motivation and attitude, a non-typical learning situation, and the challenge of matching learning peers.
Keywordstechnology enhanced learning educational game mathematics integration special education
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Adler, B.: Dyscalculia & Mathematics. Nationella Utbildningsförlaget, Sweden (2007)Google Scholar
- 2.Bandura, A.: Self-efficacy: the Exercise of Control. W.H. Freeman, New York (1997)Google Scholar
- 3.Biswas, G., Katzlberger, T., Bransford, J., Schwartz, D.: TAG-V: Extending Intelligent Learning Environments with Teachable Agents to Enhance Learning. In: Moore, J.D., Redfield, C.L., Johnson, W.L. (eds.) AI in Education, pp. 389–397. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2001)Google Scholar
- 4.Garnett, K.: Math Learning Disabilities. Division for Learning Disabilities. J. CEC (1998), http://www.ldonline.org/article/5896
- 9.Lock, R.H.: Adapting Mathematics Instruction in the General Education Classroom for Students with Mathematics Disabilities. LD Forum: Council for Learning Disabilities (1996), http://www.ldonline.org/article/5928
- 14.Pareto, L.: Graphical Arithmetic for Learners with Dyscalculia. In: 7th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. ACM, New York (2005)Google Scholar
- 15.Pareto, L.: Teachable Agents that Learn by Observing Game Playing Behavior. In: Craig, S.D., Dicheva, D. (eds.) Workshop on Intelligent Educational Games at 14th AIED International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 31–40 (2009)Google Scholar
- 16.Pareto, L., Schwartz, D.L., Svensson, L.: Learning by Guiding a Teachable Agent to Play an Educational Game. In: 14th AIED International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 662–664. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2009)Google Scholar
- 17.Pourdavood, R., Carignan, N., Martin, B.K., Sanders, M.: Cultural, Social Interaction and Mathematics Learning. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics 1 (2005)Google Scholar
- 18.Schwartz, D.L., Chase, C., Wagster, J., Okita, S., Roscoe, R., Chin, D., Biswas, G.: Interactive Metacognition: Monitoring and Regulating a Teachable Agent. In: Hacker, D.J., Dunlosky, J., Graesser, A.C. (eds.) Handbook of Metacognition in Education (2009)Google Scholar
- 20.Sjöberg, G.: If Not Dyscalculia-What Is It then? A Multimethod Study of Students being in Mathproblems seen from a Longitudinal Perspective. Dissertation, Umeå Univ. (2006), http://umu.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:144488
- 21.Vincent, J.: MicroWorlds and the Integrated Brain. In: 7th World Conference on Computers in Education: Australian topics, vol. 8, pp. 131–137 (2002)Google Scholar