Towards Improved Support for Adaptive Collaboration Scripting in IMS LD

  • Florian König
  • Alexandros Paramythis
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6383)

Abstract

The IMS Learning Design specification is acknowledged as the most promising option available presently for the implementation of collaboration scripts in e-learning. Nevertheless, it has been criticized for a number of shortcomings, and, specifically for its lack of support for constructs that would enable comprehensive adaptive support to be effected over the collaborative learning process. In this paper we propose concrete extensions to the specification, which build upon prior work and address a wide range of problems and omissions. The most important modifications introduced include: explicit support for groups, and run-time member assignment; addition of a run-time model; introduction of concrete artefacts; introduction of an event-handling model; and, a modified sequencing and script organization model.

Keywords

collaborative learning adaptive support learning design IMS LD extension sequencing grouping artifact 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Dillenbourg, P.: What do you mean by collaborative learning? In: Dillenbourg, P. (ed.) Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches, pp. 1–19. Elsevier, Oxford (1999)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Paramythis, A., Mühlbacher, J.R.: Towards New Approaches in Adaptive Support for Collaborative e-Learning. In: Proceedings of the 11th IASTED International Conference, Crete, Greece, pp. 95–100 (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lipponen, L.: Exploring foundations for computer-supported collaborative learning. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community, pp. 72–81. International Society of the Learning Sciences, Boulder (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Miao, Y., Hoeksema, K., Hoppe, H.U., Harrer, A.: CSCL Scripts: Modelling Features and Potential Use. In: Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning – Learning 2005: The next 10 Years!, pp. 423–432. International Society of the Learning Sciences, Taipei (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    O’Donnell, A.M., Dansereau, D.F.: Scripted Cooperation in Student Dyada: A Method for Analyzing and Enhancing Academic Learning and Performance. In: Hertz-Lazarowitz, R., Miller, N. (eds.) Interaction in Cooperative Groups: The theoretical Anatomy of Group Learning, pp. 120–141. Cambridge University Press, London (1992)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jameson, A.: Adaptive interfaces and agents. In: The human-computer interaction handbook: fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications, pp. 305–330. L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., Mahwah (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc.: Learning Design Specification (Version 1.0 Final Specification) (2003), http://www.imsglobal.org/learningdesign/
  8. 8.
    Koper, R.: Modeling units of study from a pedagogical perspective: the pedagogical meta-model behind EML (2001), http://hdl.handle.net/1820/36
  9. 9.
    Koper, R., Olivier, B.: Representing the Learning Design of Units of Learning. Educational Technology & Society 7(3), 97–111 (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Paramythis, A.: Adaptive Support for Collaborative Learning with IMS Learning Design: Are We There Yet? In: Proceedings of the Adaptive Collaboration Support Workshop, held in conjunction with the 5th International Conference on Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems (AH 2008), Hannover, Germany, pp. 17–29 (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Miao, Y., Hoppe, U.: Adapting Process-Oriented Learning Design to Group Characteristics. In: Proceeding of the 2005 conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education: Supporting Learning through Intelligent and Socially Informed Technology, pp. 475–482. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Santos, O.C., Boticario, J.G., Barrera, C.: Authoring A Collaborative Task Extending the IMS-LD to be Performed in a Standard-Based Adaptive Learning Management System Called aLFanet. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Adaptive Hypermedia and Collaborative Web-based Systems (AHCW 2004) held in conjunction with the International Conference on Web Engineering (ICWE 2004), Munich, Germany (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hernández-Leo, D., Perez, J., Dimitriadis, Y.: IMS Learning Design Support for the Formalization of Collaborative Learning Patterns. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2004), pp. 350–354 (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Miao, Y., Burgos, D., Griffiths, D., Koper, R.: Representation of Coordination Mechanisms in IMS Learning Design to Support Group-based Learning. In: Handbook of Research on Learning Design and Learning Objects: Issues, Applications and Technologies, pp. 330–351. IDEA Group Publishing, Hershey (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Caeiro, M., Anido, L., Llamas, M.: A Critical Analysis of IMS Learning Design. In: Proceedings of CSCL 2003, Bergen, Norway, pp. 363–367 (2003)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dalziel, J.: From Re-usable E-learning Content to Re-usable Learning Designs: Lessons from LAMS (2005), http://www.lamsinternational.com/CD/html/resources.html
  17. 17.
    Paramythis, A., Cristea, A.: Towards Adaptation Languages for Adaptive Collaborative Learning Support. In: Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Individual and Group Adaptation in Collaborative Learning Environments (WS12) held in conjunction with the 3rd European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (EC-TEL 2008), Maastricht, The Netherlands (2008). CEUR Workshop Proceedings, ISSN 1613-0073, online CEUR-WS.org/Vol-384/Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Aronson, E., Blaney, N., Stephin, C., Sikes, J., Snapp, M.: The Jigsaw Classroom. Sage Publishing Company, Beverly Hills (1978)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lochhead, J., Whimbey, A.: Teaching analytical reasoning through thinking aloud pair problem solving. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 73–92 (1987)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    de la Fuente Valentin, L., Miao, Y., Pardo, A., Delgado Kloos, C.: A Supporting Architecture for Generic Service Integration in IMS Learning Design. In: Dillenbourg, P., Specht, M. (eds.) EC-TEL 2008. LNCS, vol. 5192, pp. 467–473. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Torres, J., Dodero, J.M.: Analysis of Educational Metadata Supporting Complex Learning Processes. Metadata and Semantic Research, pp. 71–82 (2009)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hagen, K., Hibbert, D., Kinshuk, P.: Developing a Learning Management System Based on the IMS Learning Design Specification. In: IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2006), pp. 420–424. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Russell, N., Arthur, van der Aalst, W., Mulyar, N.: Workflow Control-Flow Patterns: A Revised View. BPM Center (2006)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gutierrez-Santos, S., Pardo, A., Kloos, C.D.: Authoring Courses with Rich Adaptive Sequencing for IMS Learning Design. Journal of Universal Computer Science 14, 2819–2839 (2008)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Advanced Distributed Learning Initiative: Sharable Content Object Reference Model (SCORM) 2004, 4th edn. Version 1.1 – Run-Time Environment (2009), http://www.adlnet.gov/Technologies/scorm/
  26. 26.
    Sakai Project. Sakai Foundation, http://www.sakaiproject.org

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Florian König
    • 1
  • Alexandros Paramythis
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Information Processing and Microprocessor Technology (FIM)Johannes Kepler UniversityLinzAustria

Personalised recommendations