Knowledge Maturing Activities and Practices Fostering Organisational Learning: Results of an Empirical Study

  • Andreas Kaschig
  • Ronald Maier
  • Alexander Sandow
  • Mariangela Lazoi
  • Sally-Anne Barnes
  • Jenny Bimrose
  • Claire Bradley
  • Alan Brown
  • Christine Kunzmann
  • Athanasios Mazarakis
  • Andreas Schmidt
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6383)


Knowledge work is performed in all occupations and across all industries. The level of similarity of knowledge work allows for designing supporting tools that can be widely used. In this paper an activity-based perspective towards knowledge work is taken. Based on findings from a previous ethnographically-informed study, we identified valuable activities to be supported in order to increase knowledge maturing inside companies. The goal of this paper is to contribute to which knowledge maturing activities are deemed important, so that they can be supported by IT services. Quantitative and qualitative data have been collected in 126 organisations of different size, sector and knowledge intensity. Important feedback and issues emerged and need to be managed in order to support success in the knowledge maturing activities that allow improvement of organisational learning through the dissemination and application of the most appropriate knowledge.


empirical study knowledge maturing activities knowledge work 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Blackler, F.: Knowledge, Knowledge Work and Organizations: An Overview and Interpretation. Organization Studies 16(6), 1021–1046 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wolff, E.: The Growth of Information Workers. Communications of the ACM 48(10), 37–42 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Drucker, P.F.: The Age of Social Transformation. The Atlantic Monthly 274(5), 53–80 (1994)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Alavi, M., Leidner, D.E.: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues. MIS Quarterly 25(1), 101–136 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bishop, J., et al.: Ensuring the effectiveness of a knowledge management initiative. Journal of Knowledge Management 12(4), 16–29 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Blackler, F., Reed, M., Whitaker, A.: Epilogue - An Agenda for Research. Journal of Management Studies 30(6), 1017–1020 (1993)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Boer, N.-I., Baalen, P.J., Kumar, K.: An Activity Theory Approach for Studying the Situatedness of Knowledge Sharing. In: 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICS). Hilton Waikoloa Village, USA (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Clases, C., Wehner, T.: Steps Across the Border – Cooperation, Knowledge Production and Systems Design. In: Computer Supported Cooperative Work, vol. 11, pp. 39–54 (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Krafzig, D., Banke, K., Slama, D.: Enterprise SOA: Service-Oriented Architecture Best Practices. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    DeSanctis, G., Poole, M.S.: Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory. Organization Science 5(2), 121–147 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schmidt, A.: Knowledge Maturing and the Continuity of Context as a Unifying Concept for Knowledge Management and E-Learning. In: 5th International Conference on Knowledge Management (I-KNOW 2005), Graz, Austria (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Maier, R., Schmidt, A.: Characterizing Knowledge Maturing: A Conceptional Model Integrating E-Learning and Knowledge Management. In: 4th Conference of Professional Knowledge Management (WM 2007), Potsdam (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kaschig, A., et al.: D1.1 - Results of the Ethnographic Study and Conceptual Knowledge Maturing Model, Innsbruck (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Barnes, S.-A., et al.: Knowledge Maturing at Workplaces of Knowledge Workers: Results of an Ethnographically Informed Study. In: 9th International Conference on Knowledge Management (I-KNOW 2009), Graz, Austria (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nonaka, I.: A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation. Organization Science 5(1), 14–37 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wiig, K.M.: A Knowledge Model for Situation-Handling. Journal of Knowledge Management 7(5), 6–24 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sveiby, K.-E.: A Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm to Guide in Strategy Formulation. Journal of Intellectual Capital 2(4), 344–358 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wenger, E.: Communities of Practice. Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Daskalaki, M., Blair, H.: Knowing as an Activity: Implications for the Film Industry and Semi-Permanent Work Groups. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Organizational Knowledge, Learning and Capabilities, Athens (2002)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Davenport, T.H., Jarvenpaa, S.L., Beers, M.C.: Improving Knowledge Work Processes. Sloan Management Review 37(4), 53–65 (1996)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kelloway, E.K., Barling, J.: Knowledge Work as organizational behavior. International Journal of Management Reviews 2(3), 287–304 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Holsapple, C.W., Whinston, A.B.: Knowledge-based Organizations. The Information Society 5(2), 77–90 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Snyder-Halpern, R., Corcoran-Perry, S., Narayan, S.: Developing Critical Practice Environments Supporting Knowledge Work of Nurses. Computers in Nursing 19(1), 17–23 (2001)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schultze, U.: A confessional account of an ethnography about knowledge work. MIS Quarterly 24(1), 3–41 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schultze, U.: On Knowledge Work. In: Holsapple, C.W. (ed.) Handbook on Knowledge Management 1 - Knowledge Matters, pp. 43–58. Springer, Berlin (2003)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hädrich, T.: Situation-oriented Provision of Knowledge Services. In: Information Systems 2007. University of Halle-Wittenberg, Halle(Saale) (2007)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kaschig, A., et al.: D1.2 - Results of the Representative Study and Refined Conceptual Knowledge Maturing Model (2010)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    DeLone, W.H., McLean, E.R.: Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable. Information Systems Research 3(1), 60–95 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    DeLone, W.H., McLean, E.R.: The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update. Journal of Management Information Systems 19(4), 9–30 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andreas Kaschig
    • 1
  • Ronald Maier
    • 1
  • Alexander Sandow
    • 1
  • Mariangela Lazoi
    • 2
  • Sally-Anne Barnes
    • 3
  • Jenny Bimrose
    • 3
  • Claire Bradley
    • 4
  • Alan Brown
    • 3
  • Christine Kunzmann
    • 5
  • Athanasios Mazarakis
    • 5
  • Andreas Schmidt
    • 5
  1. 1.University of InnsbruckInnsbruckAustria
  2. 2.University of SalentoLecceItaly
  3. 3.University of WarwickCoventryUK
  4. 4.London Metropolitan UniversityLondonUK
  5. 5.Research Center for Information Technology Karlsruhe (FZI)KarlsruheGermany

Personalised recommendations