Integrated New Product Introduction Challenges in Aerospace Manufacturing Engineering

Conference paper

Abstract

The key dynamic in supporting an efficient and effective new product introduction is the nature of the exchange of information between the functions of manufacturing engineering and design engineering. This chapter describes a study of this dynamic with particular regard to the role of manufacturing engineering in developing robust production process for the design intent. This study reports related work in this area and establishes the views of participants concerning product introduction process at a major aerospace manufacturer. It is found that integration between the manufacturing and design function driven by communication of qualitative data has brought benefit to the process in terms of quality cost and time. However, a stronger definition regarding the quality and usability of manufacturing process knowledge communicated to the design function is required for more effective and efficient new product introduction in the shortening timescales of the changing industrial environment.

Keywords

New product introduction Capability Manufacturing engineering Aerospace industry 

References

  1. 1.
    Morton, S.C., Brookes, N.J., Dainty, A.R.J., Backhouse, C.J., Burns, N.D. (2006) The role of social relationships in improving product development decision making. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 220(6):1017–1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Robson, C. (2002) Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-Researchers, 2nd ed. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gerwin, D., Barrowman, N.J. (2002) An evaluation of research on integrated product development. Management Science, 48(7):938–953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lettice, F., Smart, P., Evans, S. (1995) A workbook-based methodology for implementing concurrent engineering. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 16(4–6):339–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Haque, B., James-Moore, M. (2004) Applying lean thinking to new product introduction. Journal of Engineering Design, 15(1):1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tennant, C., Roberts, P. (2001) A faster way to create better quality products. International Journal of Project Management, 19(6):353–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Swink, M.L., Calantone, R. (2004) Design-manufacturing integration as a mediator of antecedents to new product design quality. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 51(4):472–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hull, F.M. (1996) Composite forms of organization as a strategy for concurrent engineering effectiveness. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 43(2):133–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liker, J.K., Collins, P.D., Hull, F.M. (1999) Flexibility and standardization: Test of a contingency model of product design-manufacturing integration. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 16(3):248–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Collins, P.D., Hull, F.M. (Mar 2002) Early simultaneous influence of manufacturing across stages of the product development process: Impact on time and cost. International Journal of Innovation Management, 6(1):1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Song, X.M., Thieme, R.J., Xie, J. (1998) The impact of cross-functional joint involvement across product development stages: An exploratory study. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15(4):289–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Parnaby, J. (1995) Design of the new product introduction process to achieve world class benchmarks. IEE Proceedings: Science, Measurement and Technology, 142(5):338–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Payne, K.H., Deasley, P.J., Morris, A.J., Evans, S., Fielding, J.P., Guenov, M., Syamsudin, H. (2002) A distributed process for the aerospace industry. Journal of Engineering Design, 13(3):253–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bradfield, D.J., Gao, J.X. (2007) A methodology to facilitate knowledge sharing in the new product development process. International Journal of Production Research, 45(7):1489–1504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Morgan, J.M., Liker, J.K. (2006) The Toyota Product Development System. Productivity Press, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Williams, M.A., Kochhar, A.K. (2000) New product introduction practices in the British manufacturing industry. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 214(10):853–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hartley, J.R. (1992) Concurrent Engineering: Shortening Lead Times, Raising Quality, and Lowering Costs. Productivity Press, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brookes, N.J., Morton, S.C., Dainty, A.R.J., Burns, N.D. (2006) Social processes, patterns and practices and project knowledge management: A theoretical framework and an empirical investigation. International Journal of Project Management, 24(6):474–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Clark, K.B., Fujimoto, T. (1991) Product Development Performance: Strategy, Organization and Management in World Auto Industry. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Atkinson, D., Al-Ashaab, A. (2008) A review and critical analysis of global new product introduction and development. International Journal of Product Development, 6(2):118–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Whiteside, A., Shehab, E., Beadle, C., Percival, M. (2009) Developing a current capability design for manufacture framework in the aerospace industry. Proceedings of the 19th CIRP Design Conference, Cranfield University, UK, pp. 223–228.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Manufacturing Department, Decision Engineering Centre, School of Applied SciencesCranfield UniversityCranfieldUK

Personalised recommendations