Bossy or Wimpy: Expressing Social Dominance by Combining Gaze and Linguistic Behaviors

  • Nikolaus Bee
  • Colin Pollock
  • Elisabeth André
  • Marilyn Walker
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6356)

Abstract

This paper examines the interaction of verbal and nonverbal information for conveying social dominance in intelligent virtual agents (IVAs). We expect expressing social dominance to be useful in applications related to persuasion and motivation; here we simply test whether we can affect users’ perceptions of social dominance using procedurally generated conversational behavior. Our results replicate previous results showing that gaze behaviors affect dominance perceptions, as well as providing new results showing that, in our experiments, the linguistic expression of disagreeableness has a significant effect on dominance perceptions, but that extraversion does not.

Keywords

intelligent virtual agents social dominance verbal and nonverbal behaviors personality evaluation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    André, E., Rist, T., van Mulken, S., Klesen, M., Baldes, S.: The automated design of believable dialogues for animated presentation teams. In: Embodied conversational agents, pp. 220–255 (2000)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bee, N., Franke, S., André, E.: Relations between facial display, eye gaze and head tilt: Dominance perception variations of virtual agents. In: Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cialdini, R.: Influence: The psychology of persuasion. Quill, New York (1993)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ekman, P., Friesen, W., O’Sullivan, M., Scherer, K.: Relative importance of face, body, and speech in judgments of personality and affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 38(2), 270–277 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fukayama, A., Ohno, T., Mukawa, N., Sawak, M., Hagita, N.: Messages embedded in gaze of interface agents - impression management with agent’s gaze. In: CHI 2002: Proc. of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp. 41–48 (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Funder, D.C.: The Personality Puzzle, 2nd edn. W. W. Norton & Company, New York (1997)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Furnham, A.: Language and personality. In: Giles, H., Robinson, W. (eds.) Handbook of Language and Social Psychology. Winley (1990)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gosling, S.D., Rentfrow, P.J., Swann, W.B.: A very brief measure of the big five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality 37, 504–528 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lance, B., Marsella, S.: The relation between gaze behavior and the attribution of emotion: An empirical study. In: Prendinger, H., Lester, J.C., Ishizuka, M. (eds.) IVA 2008. Lance, B., Marsella, S, vol. 5208, pp. 1–14. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mairesse, F., Walker, M.A.: PERSONAGE: Personality generation for dialogue. In: Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pp. 496–503 (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mairesse, F., Walker, M.A.: Trainable generation of Big-Five personality styles through data-driven parameter estimation. In: Proceedings of the 46th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Marwell, G., Schmitt, D.: Dimensions of compliance-gaining behavior: An empirical analysis. Sociometry 30(4), 350–364 (1967)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mehrabian, A.: Significance of posture and position in the communication of attitude and status relationships. Psychological Bulletin 71(5), 359–372 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mehrabian, A.: Framework for a comprehensive description and measurement of emotional states. Genetic Social and General Psychology Monographs 121(3), 339–361 (1995)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mehrabian, A.: Analysis of the big-five personality factors in terms of the PAD temperament model. Australian Journal of Psychology 48(2), 86–92 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mignault, A., Chaudhuri, A.: The many faces of a neutral face: Head tilt and perception of dominance and emotion. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 27(2), 111–132 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Norman, W.T.: Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality rating. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 66, 574–583 (1963)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Roque, A., Traum, D.: A model of compliance and emotion for potentially adversarial dialogue agents. In: Proceedings of the 8th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nikolaus Bee
    • 1
  • Colin Pollock
    • 2
  • Elisabeth André
    • 1
  • Marilyn Walker
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Computer ScienceAugsburg UniversityAugsburgGermany
  2. 2.University of CaliforniaSanta Cruz

Personalised recommendations