Advertisement

Multiple Agent Roles in an Adaptive Virtual Classroom Environment

  • Gregor Mehlmann
  • Markus Häring
  • René Bühling
  • Michael Wißner
  • Elisabeth André
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6356)

Abstract

We present the design of a cast of pedagogical agents impersonating different educational roles in an interactive virtual learning environment. Teams of those agents are used to create different learning scenarios in order to provide learners with an engaging and motivating learning experience. Authors can employ an easy to use multimodal dialog authoring tool to adapt lecture and dialog content as well as interaction management to meet their respective requirements.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Johnson, L.W., Rickel, J.W.: Animated Pedagogical Agents: Face-to-Face Interaction in Interactive Learning Environments. Artificial Intelligence in Education (11), 47–78 (2000)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rickenberg, R., Reeves, B.: The Effects of Animated Characters on Anxiety, Task Performance and Evaluations of User Interfaces. In: Proc. of the SIGCHI Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 49–56. ACM, New York (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    van Mulken, S., André, E., Müller, J.: The Persona Effect: How Substantial Is It? In: Proc. of HCI on People and Computers XIII, pp. 53–66. Springer, London (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kim, Y., Baylor, A.L.: PALS Group: Pedagogical Agents as Learning Companions: The Role of Agent Competency and Type of Interaction. Educational Technology Research and Development 54(3), 223–243 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    André, E., Rist, T., van Mulken, S., Klesen, M., Baldes, S.: The Automated Design of Believable Dialogues for Animated Presentation Teams. In: Embodied Conversational Agents, pp. 220–255. MIT Press, Cambridge (2001)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bredeweg, B., Gómez-Pérez, A., André, E., Salles, P.: DynaLearn - Engaging and Informed Tools for Learning Conceptual System Knowledge. In: Technical Report FS-09-02, pp. 46–51. AAAI Press (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bredeweg, B., Linnebank, F., Bouwer, A., Liem, J.: Garp3 - Workbench for Qualitative Modelling and Simulation. Ecological Informatics (4), 263–281 (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Conati, C., Zhao, X.: Building and Evaluating an Intelligent Pedagogical Agent to Improve the Effectiveness of an Educational Game. In: Proc. of the 9th Int. Conf. on Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 6–13. ACM, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Graesser, A.C., Person, N.K., Harter, D.: The Tutoring Research Group: Teaching Tactics and Dialog in Autotutor. Artificial Intelligence in Education (12), 257–279 (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Blair, K., Schwartz, D., Biswas, G., Leelawong, K.: Pedagogical Agents for Learning by Teaching: Teachable Agents. In: Educational Technology & Society, Special Issue on Pedagogical Agents (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Biswas, G., Roscoe, R., Jeong, H., Sulcer, B.: Promoting Self-Regulated Learning Skills in Agent-Based Learning Environments. In: Proc. of the 17th Int. Conf. on Computers in Education, pp. 67–74 (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mateas, M.: An Oz-Centric Review of Interactive Drama and Believable Agents. In: Technical Report CMU-CS-97-156, School of Computer Science CMU (1997)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bredeweg, B., Liem, J., Linnebank, F., Bühling, R., Wißner, M., Gracia del Río, J., Salles, P., Beek, W., Gómez Pérez, A.: DynaLearn: Architecture and Approach for Investigating the Acquisition of Conceptual System Knowledge for Ill-Defined Domains. In: Aleven, V., Kay, J., Mostow, J. (eds.) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. LNCS, vol. 6095, pp. 272–274. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lipscomb, L., Swanson, J., West, A.: Scaffolding. In: Emerging Perspectives on Learning, Teaching and Technology (2001)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cade, W.L., Copeland, J.L., Person, N.K., D’Mello, S.K.: Dialogue Modes in Expert Tutoring. In: Woolf, B.P., Aïmeur, E., Nkambou, R., Lajoie, S. (eds.) ITS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5091, pp. 470–479. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Randel, J.M., Morris, B.A., Wetzel, C.D., Whitehill, B.V.: The Effectiveness of Games for Educational Purposes: A Review of Recent Research. Simulation and Gaming (23), 261–276 (1992)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gebhard, P., Kipp, M., Klesen, M., Rist, T.: Authoring Scenes for Adaptive, Interactive Performances. In: Proc. of the 2th Int. Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 725–732. ACM, New York (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gregor Mehlmann
    • 1
  • Markus Häring
    • 1
  • René Bühling
    • 1
  • Michael Wißner
    • 1
  • Elisabeth André
    • 1
  1. 1.Multimedia Concepts and their ApplicationsAugsburg UniversityAugsburgGermany

Personalised recommendations