GikiCLEF Topics and Wikipedia Articles: Did They Blend?
This paper presents a post-hoc analysis on how the Wikipedia collections fared in providing answers and justifications to GikiCLEF topics. Based on all solutions found by all GikiCLEF participant systems, this paper measures how self-sufficient the particular Wikipedia collections were to provide answers and justifications for the topics, in order to better understand the recall limit that a GikiCLEF system specialised in one single language has.
KeywordsAnswer Type Evaluation Track Romanian Writer Questionable Judgement Recall Limit
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Santos, D., Cabral, L.M.: GikiCLEF: Expectations and lessons learned. In: Peters, C., et al. (eds.) CLEF 2009 Workshop, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6241, pp. 212–222. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Google Scholar
- 2.Cardoso, N., Baptista, D., Lopez-Pellicer, F.J., Silva, M.J.: Where in the Wikipedia is that answer? the XLDB at the GikiCLEF 2009 task. In: Peters, C., et al. (eds.) CLEF 2009 Workshop, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6241, pp. 305–309. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Google Scholar