Overview of the CLEF 2009 Large-Scale Visual Concept Detection and Annotation Task

  • Stefanie Nowak
  • Peter Dunker
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6242)

Abstract

The Large-Scale Visual Concept Detection and Annotation Task (LS-VCDT) in ImageCLEF 2009 aims at the detection of 53 concepts in consumer photos. These concepts are structured in an ontology which can be utilized during training and classification of the photos. The dataset consists of 18,000 Flickr photos which were manually annotated with 53 concepts. 5,000 photos were used for training and 13,000 for testing. Two evaluation paradigms have been applied, the evaluation per concept and the evaluation per photo. The evaluation per concept was performed by calculating the Equal Error Rate (EER) and the Area Under Curve (AUC). For the evaluation per photo a recently proposed ontology-based measure was utilized that takes the hierarchy and the relations of the ontology into account and calculates a score per photo. Altogether 19 research groups participated and submitted 73 runs. For the concepts, an average AUC of 84% could be achieved, including concepts with an AUC of 95%. The classification performance for each photo ranged between 68.7% and 100% with an average score of 89.6%.

Keywords

Area Under Curve Image Annotation Equal Error Rate Sift Feature Multiple Kernel Learn 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Huiskes, M.J., Lew, M.S.: The MIR Flickr Retrieval Evaluation. In: MIR 2008: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM International Conference on Multimedia Information Retrieval. ACM, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nowak, S., Dunker, P.: A Consumer Photo Tagging Ontology: Concepts and Annotations. In: THESEUS/ImageCLEF Pre-Workshop 2009, Co-located with the Cross Language Evaluation Forum (CLEF) Workshop and 13th European Conference on Digital Libraries ECDL, Corfu, Greece (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nowak, S., Lukashevich, H.: Multilabel Classification Evaluation using Ontology Information. In: The 1st Workshop on Inductive Reasoning and Machine Learning on the Semantic Web -IRMLeS 2009, co-located with the 6th Annual European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC), Heraklion, Greece (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nowak, S., Lukashevich, H., Dunker, P., Rüger, S.: Performance Measures for Multilabel Classification - A Case Study in the Area of Image Classification. In: ACM SIGMM International Conference on Multimedia Information Retrieval (ACM MIR), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Glotin, H., Fakeri-Tabrizi, A., Mulhem, P., Ferecatu, M., Zhao, Z., Tollari, S., Quenot, G., Sahbi, H., Dumont, E., Gallinari, P.: Comparison of Various AVEIR Visual Concept Detectors with an Index of Carefulness. In: CLEF Working Notes 2009, Corfu, Greece (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ngiam, J., Goh, H.: Learning Global and Regional Features for Photo Annotation. In: Peters, C., Tsikrika, T., Müller, H., Kalpathy-Cramer, J., Jones, J., Gonzalo, J., Caputo, B. (eds.) CLEF 2009 Workshop, Part II. LNCS, vol. 6242, pp. 287–290. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Binder, A., Kawanabe, M.: Enhancing Recognition of Visual Concepts with Primitive Color Histograms via Non-sparse Multiple Kernel Learning. In: Peters, C., Tsikrika, T., Müller, H., Kalpathy-Cramer, J., Jones, J., Gonzalo, J., Caputo, B. (eds.) CLEF 2009 Workshop, Part II. LNCS, vol. 6242, pp. 269–276. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hare, J., Lewis, P.: IAM@ImageCLEFPhotoAnnotation 2009: Naive application of a linear-algebraic semantic space. In: CLEF Working Notes 2009, Corfu, Greece (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Douze, M., Guillaumin, M., Mensink, T., Schmid, C., Verbeek, J.: INRIA-LEARs participation to ImageCLEF 2009. In: CLEF Working Notes 2009, Corfu, Greece (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    van de Sande, K., Gevers, T., Smeulders, A.: The University of Amsterdam’s Concept Detection System at ImageCLEF 2009. In: Peters, C., Tsikrika, T., Müller, H., Kalpathy-Cramer, J., Jones, J., Gonzalo, J., Caputo, B. (eds.) CLEF 2009 Workshop, Part II. LNCS, vol. 6242, pp. 261–268. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sarin, S., Kameyama, W.: Joint Contribution of Global and Local Features for Image Annotation. In: CLEF Working Notes 2009, Corfu, Greece (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dumont, E., Zhao, Z.Q., Glotin, H., Paris, S.: A new TFIDF Bag of Visual Words for Concept Detection. In: Peters, C., Tsikrika, T., Müller, H., Kalpathy-Cramer, J., Jones, J., Gonzalo, J., Caputo, B. (eds.) CLEF 2009 Workshop, Part II. LNCS, vol. 6242. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Llorente, A., Motta, E., Rüger, S.: Exploring the Semantics Behind a Collection to Improve Automated Image Annotation. In: Peters, C., Tsikrika, T., Müller, H., Kalpathy-Cramer, J., Jones, J., Gonzalo, J., Caputo, B. (eds.) CLEF 2009 Workshop, Part II. LNCS, vol. 6242, pp. 307–314. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pham, T., Maisonnasse, L., Mulhem, P., Chevallet, J.P., Quénot, G., Al Batal, R.: MRIM-LIG at ImageCLEF 2009: Robot Vision, Image annotation and retrieval tasks. In: Peters, C., Tsikrika, T., Müller, H., Kalpathy-Cramer, J., Jones, J., Gonzalo, J., Caputo, B. (eds.) CLEF 2009 Workshop, Part II. LNCS, vol. 6242, pp. 324–331. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Daróczy, B., Petrás, I., Benczúr, A., Fekete, Z., Nemeskey, D., Siklósi, D., Weiner, Z.: Interest Point and Segmentation-Based Photo Annotation. In: Peters, C., Tsikrika, T., Müller, H., Kalpathy-Cramer, J., Jones, J., Gonzalo, J., Caputo, B. (eds.) CLEF 2009 Workshop, Part II. LNCS, vol. 6242, pp. 340–347. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ferecatu, M., Sahbi, H.: TELECOM ParisTech at ImageClef 2009: Large Scale Visual Concept Detection and Annotation Task. In: CLEF working notes 2009, Corfu, Greece (2009)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Escalante, H., Gonzalez, J., Hernandez, C., Lopez, A., Montex, M., Morales, E., Ruiz, E., Sucar, L., Villasenor, L.: TIA-INAOE’s Participation at ImageCLEF 2009. In: CLEF working notes 2009, Corfu, Greece (2009)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Iftene, A., Vamanu, L., Croitoru, C.: UAIC at ImageCLEF 2009 Photo Annotation Task. In: Peters, C., Tsikrika, T., Müller, H., Kalpathy-Cramer, J., Jones, J., Gonzalo, J., Caputo, B. (eds.) CLEF 2009 Workshop, Part II. LNCS, vol. 6242, pp. 283–286. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fakeri-Tabrizi, A., Tollari, S., Usunier, N., Gallinari, P.: Improving Image Annotation in Imbalanced Classification Problems with Ranking SVM. In: Peters, C., Tsikrika, T., Müller, H., Kalpathy-Cramer, J., Jones, J., Gonzalo, J., Caputo, B. (eds.) CLEF 2009 Workshop, Part II. LNCS, vol. 6242, pp. 291–294. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ah-Pine, J., Clinchant, S., Csurka, G., Liu, Y.: XRCE’s Participation in ImageCLEF 2009. In: CLEF Working Notes 2009, Corfu, Greece (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefanie Nowak
    • 1
  • Peter Dunker
    • 2
  1. 1.Audio-Visual Systems, Fraunhofer IDMTIlmenauGermany
  2. 2.Media Technology LabGracenote IncEmeryvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations