Improved Precision in the Measurement of Longitudinal Global and Regional Volumetric Changes via a Novel MRI Gradient Distortion Characterization and Correction Technique

  • Vladimir S. Fonov
  • Andrew Janke
  • Zografos Caramanos
  • Douglas L. Arnold
  • Sridar Narayanan
  • G. Bruce Pike
  • D. Louis Collins
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6326)

Abstract

Reducing measurement variability in MRI-based morphometric analysis of human brain structures will increase statistical power to detect changes between groups and longitudinally over time in individual subjects. One source of measurement error in anatomical MR is magnetic field gradient-induced geometric distortion. This work proposes a method to characterize and compensate for these distortions using a novel image processing technique relying on the image acquisition of a phantom with known geometrical dimensions, without the need to acquire the magnetic field mapping. The method is not specific to any particular shape of the phantom, as long as it provides enough coverage of the volume of interest and enough structure to densely sample the distortion field. The distortions are expressed in terms of spherical harmonic functions, which are then used to define the distortion correction field for the volume of interest. Accuracy of the distortion measurement was evaluated using numerical simulation and reproducibility was estimated using multiple scans of the phantom in the same scanner. Finally, scan-rescan experiments with nine healthy subjects demonstrated that 90% of the distortion (in terms of local volume change) can be corrected with this technique.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Jovicich, J., Czanner, S., Greve, D., Haley, E., van der Kouwe, A., Gollub, R., Kennedy, D., Schmitt, F., Brown, G., Macfall, J., Fischl, B., Dale, A.: Reliability in multi-site structural MRI studies: effects of gradient non-linearity correction on phantom and human data. Neuroimage 30, 436–443 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wang, D., Doddrell, D.M., Cowin, G.: A novel phantom and method for comprehensive 3-dimensional measurement and correction of geometric distortion in magnetic resonance imaging. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 22, 529–542 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baldwin, L., Wachowicz, K., Thomas, S., Rivest, R., Fallone, G.: Characterization, prediction, and correction of geometric distortion in 3 T MR images. Medical Physics 34, 388–399 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Janke, A., Zhao, H., Cowin, G.J., Galloway, G.J., Doddrell, D.M.: Use of spherical harmonic deconvolution methods to compensate for nonlinear gradient effects on MRI images. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 52, 115–122 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Krieg, R.S.O.: Method for three-dimensionally correcting distortions and magnetic resonance apparatus for implementing the method, Patent 6,501,273 (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Caramanos, Z., Fonov, V.S., Francis, S.J., Narayanan, S., Pike, G.B., Collins, D.L., Arnold, D.L.: Gradient distortions in MRI: Characterizing and correcting for their effects on SIENA-generated measures of brain volume change. NeuroImage 49, 1601–1611 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Magphan® Quantitative Imaging Phantom (ADNI) (2010) Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Price, R.R., Axel, L., Morgan, T., Newman, R., Perman, W., Schneiders, N., Selikson, M., Wood, M., Thomas, S.R.: Quality assurance methods and phantoms for magnetic resonance imaging: Report of AAPM nuclear magnetic resonance Task Group No. 1. Medical Physics 17, 287–295 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    LEGO Company Profile (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Collins, D.L., Evans, A.C.: Animal: Validation and Applications of Nonlinear Registration-Based Segmentation. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence (IJPRAI) 11, 1271–1294 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sled, J.G., Zijdenbos, A.P., Evans, A.C.: A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 17, 87–97 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Collins, D.L., Neelin, P., Peters, T.M., Evans, A.C.: Automatic 3D intersubject registration of MR volumetric data in standardized Talairach space. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 18, 192–205 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Leow, A.D., Klunder, A.D., Jack, J.C.R., Toga, A.W., Dale, A.M., Bernstein, M.A., Britson, P.J., Gunter, J.L., Ward, C.P., Whitwell, J.L., Borowski, B.J., Fleisher, A.S., Fox, N.C., Harvey, D., Kornak, J., Schuff, N., Studholme, C., Alexander, G.E., Weiner, M.W., Thompson, P.M.: Longitudinal stability of MRI for mapping brain change using tensor-based morphometry. NeuroImage 31, 627–640 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vladimir S. Fonov
    • 1
  • Andrew Janke
    • 2
  • Zografos Caramanos
    • 1
  • Douglas L. Arnold
    • 1
  • Sridar Narayanan
    • 1
  • G. Bruce Pike
    • 1
  • D. Louis Collins
    • 1
  1. 1.McConnell Brain Imaging Center, Montreal Neurological InstituteMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Department of Geriatric Medicine, College of Medicine and Health SciencesThe Australian National UniversityCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations