The Interval-Valued Truth Degree Theory of the Modal Formulas

  • Bi-jing Li
  • Guo-jun Wang
Part of the Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing book series (AINSC, volume 82)

Abstract

The modal logic, as a decidable fragment of predict logic, not only solved the paradox of material implication thoroughly, but also have important properties. The present paper defines the standard model and the interval-valued truth degree of modal formulas after analyzing the idea of possible world. Then the harmonious theorem is proved, that is, the interval-value truth degree of formulas without modal operators degenerate into a point and the value is just equal to its Borel truth degree.

Keywords

Modal logic modal operator Borel probability measure interval-valued truth degree 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Blackburn, P., de Rijke, M., Venema, Y.: Modal Logic. Cambridge University Press, New York (2001)MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chagrov, A., Zakharyaschev, M.: Modal Logic. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1997)MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chellas, B.F.: Modal Logic: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press, London (1980)MATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lewis, C.I.: A Survery of Symbolic Logic, 2nd edn. University of California Press, Berkeley (1918/1960)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kripke, S.A.: Semantic considerations on the modal logic. Acta Philos. Fennica 16, 83–94 (1963)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Prior, A.N.: Possible Worlds. Philos. Quarterly 12, 36–43 (1962)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mates, B.: The Philosophy of Leibniz. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1986)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Prior, A.N.: Time and Modality. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1957)MATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gochet, P., Gribomont, P.: Handbook of the history of Logic. Epistemic Logic, vol. 7, pp. 99–195. Elsevier, Holland (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Koller, D., Pfeffer, A.: Representations and solutions for game-theoretic problems. Artificial Intelligence 4(3), 169–190 (1997)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Benalycherif, L., Mclsaac, A.: A Semantic Condition for Data Independence and Application in Hardware Verification. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 250(1), 39–54 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fagin, R., Halpern, J.Y., Moses, Y.: Reasoning About Konwledge. MIT Press, MA (1995)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang, G.J., Duan, Q.L.: The n-truth Degree Theory of Modal Formulas and Harmonious Theorem. Science in China (Ser. F) 39(2), 234–245 (2009) (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wang, G.J.: An Introduction of Symbolic Logic and Resolution Priciple, 2nd edn. Science Press, Beijing (2008) (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhong, H.J.: Borel-type Probability Quantitative Logic (submitted for publication) (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cohn, D.L.: Measure Theory. Brikhäuser, Boston (1980)MATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang, G.J.: Non-classical Mathematical Logic and Approximate Reasoning, 2nd edn. Science Press, Beijing (2008) (in Chinese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bi-jing Li
    • 1
  • Guo-jun Wang
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of MathematicsBaoji College of Arts and ScienceBaojiChina
  2. 2.College of Mathematics and Information ScienceShaanxi Normal UniversityXi’anChina

Personalised recommendations