CM-Quality: A Pattern-Based Method and Tool for Conceptual Modeling Evaluation and Improvement

  • Kashif Mehmood
  • Samira Si-Said Cherfi
  • Isabelle Comyn-Wattiau
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6295)

Abstract

Conceptual models serve as the blueprints of information systems and their quality plays a decisive role in the success of the end system. It has been witnessed that majority of the IS change-requests result due to deficient functionalities in the information systems. Therefore, a good analysis and design method should ensure that conceptual models are correct and complete, as they are the communicating mediator between the users and the development team. Our approach evaluates the conceptual models on multiple levels of granularity in addition to providing the corrective actions or transformations for improvement. We propose quality patterns to help the non-expert users in evaluating their models with respect to their quality goal. This paper also demonstrates a software utility (CM-Quality) that implements the proposed evaluation approach.

Keywords

Conceptual Model Quality Quality Patterns Quality Attributes Quality Metrics Quality Evaluation Quality Improvement 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Cherfi, S.S., Akoka, J., Comyn-Wattiau, I.: Measuring UML Conceptual Modeling Quality-Method and Implementation. In: Pucheral, P. (ed.) Proceedings of the BDA Conference, Collection INT, France (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    ISO/IEC 9126, Software Engineering - Product quality - Part 1: Quality model (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    ISO/IEC 25030:2007, Software Engineering - Software Product Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) - Quality Requirements, Int’l Organization for Standardization (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Batini, C., Ceri, S., Navathe, C.: Conceptual Database Design: An Entity-Relationship approach, p. 496. Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company Inc. (1992)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lindland, O.I., Sindre, G., Sølvberg, A.: Understanding Quality in Conceptual Modeling. IEEE Software 11(2), 42–49 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mehmood, K., Cherfi, S.S., Comyn-Wattiau, I.: Data Quality Through Model Quality: A Quality Model for Measuring and Improving the Understandability of Conceptual Models. In: DQS 2009, International Workshop on Data Quality and Security in Conjunction with (CIKM 2009), Hong Kong, November 2-6 (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mehmood, K., Cherfi, S.S., Comyn-Wattiau, I.: Data Quality through Conceptual Model Quality - Reconciling Researchers and Practitioners through a Customizable Quality Model. In: ICIQ (Intl. Conference on Information Quality), Germany, November 7-8 (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cherfi, S.S., Akoka, J., Comyn-Wattiau, I.: Quality Patterns for Conceptual Modeling. In: Li, Q., Spaccapietra, S., Yu, E., Olivé, A. (eds.) ER 2008. LNCS, vol. 5231, pp. 142–153. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M., Jacobson, M., Fiksdahl-King, I., Angel, S.: A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. Oxford University Press, USA (1977)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Beck, K., Cunningham, W.: Using Pattern Language for Object-Oriented Programs. In: OOPSLA 1987 Workshop on the Specification and Design for Object-Oriented Programming (1987)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., Vlissides, J.: Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1995)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Houdek, F., Kempter, H.: Quality Patterns – An approach to packaging software engineering experience. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes 22(3) (1997)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Moody, D.L.: Theoretical and Practical Issues in Evaluating the Quality of Conceptual Models. Data & Knowledge Engineering 55, 243–276 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Basili, V.R., Gianluigi, C., Rombach, H.D.: The Goal Question Metric Approach. In: Encyclopedia of Software Engineering. Wiley, Chichester (1994)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Larman, C.: Applying UML and Patterns: an Introduction to Object-Oriented Analysis and Design and the Unified Process, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (2001)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly 28(1), 75–105 (2004)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    March, S.T., Smith, G.F.: Design and Natural Science Research on Information Technology. Decision Support Systems 15, 251–266 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Preiss, O., Wegmann, A., Wong, J.: On Quality Attribute Based Software Engineering. In: Proceedings of the 27th EUROMICRO Conference (2001)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Manola, F.: Providing Systemic Properties (Ilities) and Quality of Service in Component-Based Systems. Object Services and Consulting, Inc., Technical Report (1999)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Moody, D.L., Shanks, G.G.: Improving the quality of data models: empirical validation of a quality management Framework. Information Systems 28(6), 619–650 (2003)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Moody, D.L., Shanks, G.G., Darke, P.: Strategies for improving the quality of entity relationship models. In: Information Resource Management Association (IRMA) Conference, Idea Group Publishing, USA (2000)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Moody, D.L., Shanks, G.G.: What makes a good data model? A framework for evaluating and improving the quality of entity relationship models. Australian Computer Journal (1998)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nelson, R.R., Todd, P.A.: Antecedents of Information and System Quality: An Empirical Examination within the Context of Data Warehousing. Journal of Management Information Systems 21(4), 199–235 (2005)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Purao, S., Vaishnavi, V.: Product Metrics for Object-Oriented Systems. ACM Computing Surveys 35(2), 191–221 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kashif Mehmood
    • 1
    • 2
  • Samira Si-Said Cherfi
    • 1
  • Isabelle Comyn-Wattiau
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.CEDRIC-CNAMParis Cedex 03France
  2. 2.ESSEC Business SchoolCergy-Pontoise CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations