Visualizing Threaded Conversation Networks: Mining Message Boards and Email Lists for Actionable Insights

  • Derek L. Hansen
  • Ben Shneiderman
  • Marc Smith
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6335)

Abstract

Analyzing complex online relationships is a difficult job, but new information visualization tools are enabling a wider range of users to make actionable insights from the growing volume of online data. This paper describes the challenges and methods for conducting analyses of threaded conversations such as found in enterprise message boards, email lists, and forums. After defining threaded conversation, we characterize the types of networks that can be extracted from them. We then provide 3 mini case studies to illustrate how actionable insights for community managers can be gained by applying the network analysis metrics and visualizations available in the free, open source NodeXL tool, which is a powerful, yet easy-to-use tool embedded in Excel 2007/2010.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Resnick, P., Hansen, D., Riedl, J., Terveen, L., Ackerman, M.: Beyond Threaded Conversation. In: CHI 2005 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2138–2139. ACM, New York (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Smith, M., Kollock, P. (eds.): Communities in Cyberspace. Routeledge, London (1999)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Preece, J.: Online Communities: Designing Usability and Supporting Sociability. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kim, A.J.: Community Building on the Web: Secret Strategies for Successful Online Communities. Peachpit Press, Berkeley (2000)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Powazek, D.: Designing for Community. Waite Group Press, Corte Madera (2001)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nonnecke, B., Preece, J.: Lurker Demographics: Counting the Silent. In: Proceedings of the SIG-CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 73–80. ACM, New York (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hansen, D.L.: Overhearing the Crowd: an Empirical Examination of Conversation Reuse in a Technical Support Community. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Communities and Technologies, pp. 155–164. ACM, New York (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Garton, L., Haythornthwaite, C., Wellman, B.: Studying Online Social Networks. J. Comput-Mediat Comm. 3(1) (1997)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wellman, B., Salaff, J., Dimitrova, D., Garton, L., Gulia, M., Haythornthwaite, C.: Computer Networks as Social Networks: Collaborative Work, Telework, and Virtual Community. Annual Review of Sociology 22, 213–238 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Smith, M.A., Shneiderman, B., Milic-Frayling, N., Rodrigues, E.M., Barash, V., Dunne, C., Capone, T., Perer, A., Gleave, E.: Analyzing (social media) networks with NodeXL. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Communities and Technologies, pp. 255–264. ACM, New York (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hansen, D.L., Rotman, D., Bonsignore, E., Milic-Frayling, N., Mendes Rodrigues, E., Smith, M., Shneiderman, B., Capone, T.: Do You Know the Way to SNA? A Process Model for Analyzing and Visualizing Social Media Data. HCIL-2009-17 Tech Report (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hansen, D.: Knowledge Sharing, Maintenance, and Use in Online Support Communities. Unpublished Dissertation, University of Michigan (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bilgic, M., Licamele, L., Getoor, L., Shneiderman, B.: D-Dupe: An Interactive Tool for Entity Resolution in Social Networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Harel, D., Koren, Y.: A Fast Multi-scale Method for Drawing Large Graphs. In: Marks, J. (ed.) GD 2000. LNCS, vol. 1984, pp. 183–196. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Welser, H.T., Gleave, H., Fisher, D., Smith, M.: Visualizing the signatures of social roles in online discussion groups. Journal of Social Structure 8(2) (2007)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Butler, B., Sproull, L., Kiesler, S., Kraut, R.E.: Community Effort in Online Groups: Who Does the Work and Why? In: Weisband, S., Atwater, L. (eds.) Leadership at a Distance. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., Mahwah (2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Turner, T.C., Smith, M.A., Fisher, D., Welser, H.T.: Picturing Usenet: Mapping Computer-Mediated Collective Action. J. Comput-Mediat Comm. 10(4) (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Derek L. Hansen
    • 1
  • Ben Shneiderman
    • 2
  • Marc Smith
    • 3
  1. 1.College of Information Studies & Center for the Advanced Study of Communities and InformationUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA
  2. 2.Dept. Of Computer Science & Human-Computer Interaction LabUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA
  3. 3.Connected Action Consulting Group, Silicon ValleyUSA

Personalised recommendations