User-Contributed Descriptive Metadata for Libraries and Cultural Institutions

  • Michael A. Zarro
  • Robert B. Allen
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6273)

Abstract

The Library of Congress and other cultural institutions are collecting highly informative user-contributed metadata as comments and notes expressing historical and factual information not previously identified with a resource. In this observational study we find a number of valuable annotations added to sets of images posted by the Library of Congress on the Flickr Commons. We propose a classification scheme to manage contributions and mitigate information overload issues. Implications for information retrieval and search are discussed. Additionally, the limits of a “collection” are becoming blurred as connections are being built via hyperlinks to related resources outside of the library collection, such as Wikipedia and locally relevant websites. Ideas are suggested for future projects, including interface design and institutional use of user-contributed information.

Keywords

Annotation Descriptors Metadata Social Media 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Allen, R.B.: Timelines as Information System Interfaces. In: Proceedings International Symposium on Digital Libraries, Tsukuba, Japan (August 1995), http://www.-cis.drexel.edu/faculty/ballen/PAPERS/TL/isdl.pdf
  2. 2.
    Anderson, S., Allen, R.B.: Envisioning the Archival Commons. The American Archivist 72(2), 383–400 (Fall/Winter 2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
    Guy, M., Tonkin, E.: Folksonomies. Tidying Up Tags? D-Lib Magazine 12(1) (2006), http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january06/guy/01guy.html
  5. 5.
    Kalfatovic, M., Kapsalis, E., Spiess, K., Van Camp, A., Edson, M.: Smithsonian team Flickr: A library, archives, and museums collaboration in web 2.0 space. Archival Science 8(4), 267–277 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Marlow, C., Naaman, M., Boyd, D., Davis, M.: HT 2006, tagging paper, taxonomy, Flickr, academic article, to read. In: Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, HYPERTEXT 2006, Odense, Denmark, August 22 - 25, pp. 31–40. ACM, New York (2006), doi: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1149941.1149949 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Marshall, C.C.: No bull, no spin: a comparison of tags with other forms of user metadata. In: Proceedings of the 9th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, JCDL 2009, Austin, TX, USA, June 15-19, pp. 241–250. ACM Press, New York (2009), doi: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1555400.1555438 Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Springer, M., Dulabahn, B., Michel, P., Natanson, B., Reser, D., Woodward, D., Zinkham, H.: For the Common Good: The Library of Congress Flickr Pilot Project. Technical Report. Library of Congress (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Trant, J.: Tagging, folksonomy and art museums: Early experiments and ongoing research. Journal of Digital Information 12(1) (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    van Hooland, S.: Spectator Becomes Annotator: Possibilities Offered by User-Generated Metadata for Image Databases. In: Proceedings of the CILIP Conference, University of East Anglia, UK (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael A. Zarro
    • 1
  • Robert B. Allen
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Information Science and TechnologyDrexel University 

Personalised recommendations