Architecture for a Collaborative Research Environment Based on Reading List Sharing

  • Gabriella Kazai
  • Paolo Manghi
  • Katerina Iatropoulou
  • Tim Haughton
  • Marko Mikulicic
  • Antonis Lempesis
  • Natasa Milic-Frayling
  • Natalia Manola
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6273)

Abstract

Scholarly research involves a systematic study of information sources in order to establish facts and reach new conclusions. It encompasses survey, analysis, evaluation, and creation as distinct phases that are performed iteratively and often in parallel by accessing a range of local and remote resources. Throughout these activities scholars create collections of relevant work, ranging from publication references to new information acquired through experiments or correspondence with other scholars. We use the term reading list to refer to such collections. Existing software packages or web services for managing publication lists, like CiteULike, lack integration with researchers’ workflow which may require access to both desktop and online resources. In this paper we describe the architecture and system design of ScholarLynk, a desktop tagging tool that enables researchers to build and maintain reading lists across distributed data stores, in collaboration with other researchers.

Keywords

Desktop tagging tool scholarly research reading lists 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Alford, M.L., Mendes, E.: Scholarly research process: investigating the effects of link type and directionality. In: Proc. of HYPERTEXT 2009, pp. 99–108. ACM, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bishop, A.: Digital libraries and knowledge disaggregation: The use of journal article components. In: Proc. of ACM Conference on Digital Libraries, pp. 29–39. ACM Press, New York (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Borgman, C.L., Furner, J.: Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 36 (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dang, D.-T., Tan, Y.F., Kan, M.-Y.: Towards a Webpage-Based Bibliographic Manager. In: Buchanan, G., Masoodian, M., Cunningham, S.J. (eds.) ICADL 2008. LNCS, vol. 5362, pp. 313–316. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ellis Ellis, D.: Modeling the information-seeking patterns of academic researchers: A grounded theory approach. The Library Quarterly 63(4), 469–486 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Farooq, U., Ganoe, C.H., Carroll, J.M., Giles, C.L.: Supporting distributed scientific collaboration: Implications for designing the CiteSeer collaboratory. In: Proc. of 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE Comp. Society, Los Alamitos (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Henning, V., Reichelt, J.: Mendeley - A Last.fm For Research? In: Proc. of the 2008 Fourth IEEE International Conference on Escience, pp. 327–328. IEEE Comp. Society, Los Alamitos (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hull, D., Pettifer, S.R., Kell, D.B.: Defrosting the Digital Library: Bibliographic Tools for the Next Generation Web. PLoS Comput. Biol. 4(10) (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kolb, D.: Association and argument: Hypertext in and around the writing process. NRHM 11, 7–26 (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Marlow, C., Naaman, M., Boyd, D., Davis, M.: HT06, tagging paper, taxonomy, Flickr, academic article, to read. In: Proc. of HYPERTEXT 2006, pp. 31–40. ACM, New York (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nakakoji, K., Yamamoto, Y., Akaishi, M., Hori, K.: Interaction design for scholarly writing: hypertext representations as a means for creative knowledge work. New Rev. Hypermedia Multimedia 11(1), 39–67 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Oleksik, G., Wilson, M.L., Tashman, C., Mendes Rodrigues, E., Kazai, G., Smyth, G., Milic-Frayling, N., Jones, R.: Lightweight tagging expands information and activity management practices. In: Proc. of CHI 2009, pp. 279–288. ACM, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Palmer, C.L., Teffeau, L.C., Pirmann, C.M.: Scholarly Information Practices in the Online Environment: Themes from the Literature and Implications for Library Service Development. In: Report commissioned by OCLC Research (2009), http://www.oclc.org/programs/publications/reports/2009-02.pdf
  14. 14.
    Voida, S., Mynatt, E.D., Edwards, W.K.: Re-framing the desktop interface around the activities of knowledge work. In: Proc. of UIST 2008, pp. 211–220. ACM, New York (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
  16. 16.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gabriella Kazai
    • 1
  • Paolo Manghi
    • 2
  • Katerina Iatropoulou
    • 3
  • Tim Haughton
    • 1
  • Marko Mikulicic
    • 2
  • Antonis Lempesis
    • 3
  • Natasa Milic-Frayling
    • 1
  • Natalia Manola
    • 3
  1. 1.Microsoft ResearchCambridgeUK
  2. 2.Istituto di Scienza e Tecnologie dell’InformazioneCentro Nazionale delle RicerchePisaItaly
  3. 3.Department of InformaticsNational and Kapodistrian University of AthensGreece

Personalised recommendations