Analysis of Computer Science Communities Based on DBLP

  • Maria Biryukov
  • Cailing Dong
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6273)


It is popular nowadays to bring techniques from bibliometrics and scientometrics into the world of digital libraries to explore mechanisms which underlie community development. In this paper we use the DBLP data to investigate the author’s scientific career, and analyze some of the computer science communities. We compare them in terms of productivity and population stability, and use these features to compare the sets of top-ranked conferences with their lower ranked counterparts.


bibliographic databases author profiling scientific communities bibliometrics 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Backstrom, L., Huttenlocher, D.P., Kleinberg, J.M., Lan, X.: Group formation in large social networks: membership, growth, and evolution. In: KDD (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bird, C., et al.: Structure and dynamics of research collaboration in computer science. In: Jonker, W., Petković, M. (eds.) SDM 2009. LNCS, vol. 5776, pp. 826–827. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blei, D., Ng, A., Jordan, M.I.: Latent dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3, 993–1022 (2003)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Elmacioglu E., Lee, D.: On six degrees of separation in DBLP - DB and more. SIGMOD Record (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Giles, C.L., Council, I.G.: Who gets acknowledged: Measuring scientific contributions through automatic acknowledgment indexing. Pnas 101, 51 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Huang, J., Zhuang, Z., Li, J., Giles, C.L.: Collaboration over time: Characterizing and Modeling Netweork Evolution. In: WSDM (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Newman, M.E.J., Barabasi, A.L., Watts, D.J.: The structure and dynamics of networks. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading (2006)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sidiropoulos, A., Manolopoulos, Y.: A new perspective to automatically rank scientific conferences using digital libraries. Inf. Process. Manage. 41(2), 289–312 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Watts, D.J., Strogatz, S.H.: Collective dynamics of small-world networks. Nature, 440–442 (1998)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yan, S., Lee, D.: Toward alternative measures for ranking venues: a case of database research community. In: JCDL, pp. 235–244 (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zaïane, O., Chen, J., Goebel, R.: Mining research communities in bibliographical data. In: WebKDD/SNA-KDD, pp. 59–76 (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhou, D., Ji, X., Zha, H., Giles, C.L.: Topic evolution and social interactions: how authors effect research. In: CIKM, pp. 248–257 (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhuang, Z., Elmaciouglu, E., Lee, D., Giles, C.L.: Measuring conference quality by mining program committee characteristics. In: JCDL, pp. 225–234 (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria Biryukov
    • 1
  • Cailing Dong
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of Science, Technology and Communications, MINE groupUniversity of LuxembourgLuxembourg
  2. 2.School of Computer Science and TechnologyShandong UniversityJinanChina

Personalised recommendations