The Design of an Active Structural Vibration Reduction System Using a Modified Particle Swarm Optimization

  • Adam Schmidt
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6234)


This paper presents the synthesis of an active control system using a modified particle swarm optimization method. The system’s controller design is analyzed as a minimalization of the building stories’ acceleration. The proposed fitness function is computationally efficient and incorporates the constraints on the system’s stability and the maximum output of actuators. In order to handle the constraints the PSO was modified to take into account the particles’ distance to the best and the worst solutions. The performance of the obtained controller was tested using historical earthquake records. The performed numerical simulations proved that the designed controller is capable of efficient vibrations reduction.


active vibration reduction particle swarm optimization 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Clerc, M., Kennedy, J.: The particle swarm - explosion, stability, and convergence in a multidimensional complex space. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 6(1), 58–73 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gaing, Z.L.: A particle swarm optimization approach for optimum design of PID controller in AVR system. IEEE Transaction on Energy Conversion 19(2), 384–391 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    He, Q., Wang, L.: An effective co-evolutionary particle swarm optimization for constrained engineering design problems. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 20, 89–99 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hu, X., Eberhart, R. C.: Solving constrained nonlinear optimization problems with particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of the sixth world multiconference on systemics, cybernetics and informatics 2002 (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kennedy, J., Eberhart, R.C.: Particle swarm optimization. In: IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, vol. 4, pp. 1942–1948 (1995)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lewandowski, R.: A survey of modern methods of vibration reduction of building structures. Vibrations in Physical Systems 22, 37–48 (2006)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Parsopoulos, K.E., Vrahatis, M.: Particle swarm method for constrained optimization problems. In: Proceedings of the Euro-international symposium on computational intelligence (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Qiao, W., Venayagamoorthy, G., Harley, R.: Design of optimal PI controllers for doubly fed induction generators driven by wind turbines using particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of 2006 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, pp. 1982–1987 (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sedlaczek, K., Eberhard, P.: Using augmented lagrangian particle swarm optimization for constrained problems in engineering. Struct. Multidisc. Optim. 32, 277–286 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sun, T.Y., Huang, C.S., Tsai, S.J.: Particle swarm optimizer based controller design for vehicle navigation system. In: IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, pp. 909–914 (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wang, J., Brackett, B., Harley, R.: Particle swarm-assisted state feedback control: From pole selection to state estimation. In: 2009 American Control Conference, pp. 1493–1498 (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang, Y., Cai, Z.: A hybrid multi-swarm particle swarm optimization to solve constrained optimization problems. Front. Comp. Sci. China 3(1), 38–52 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yao, J.T.P.: Concept of structural control. ASCE J. Struct. Div. 98, 1567–1575 (1972)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adam Schmidt
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Control and Information EngineeringPoznan University of TechnologyPoznanPoland

Personalised recommendations