Explorations in Player Motivations: Virtual Agents

  • Barbaros Bostan
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6243)

Abstract

Creating believable agents with personality is a popular research area in game studies but academic research in this area usually focuses on one facet of personality - for example, only on moods or character traits. The present study proposes a motivational framework to predict goal-directed behaviour of virtual agents in a computer game and explores the opportunities of using personality inventories based on the same motivational framework to design virtual agents with personality. This article claims that motivation to reach a goal is influenced by psychological needs which are represented with an equation that determines the strength of a character’s motivational force. The framework represented by this study takes into account psychological needs and their interrelations for analyzing choices of virtual agents in a computer game.

Keywords

Personality motivations virtual agents behavioural architecture 

References

  1. 1.
    Cutumisu, M., Szafron, D., Schaeffer, J., Mcnaughton, M., Roy, T., Onuczko, C., Carbonaro, M.: Generating ambient behaviors in computer role-playing games. IEEE Intelligent Systems 21(5), 19–27 (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Livingstone, D.: Turing’s test and believable AI in games. ACM Computers in Entertainment 4(1), 6–18 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Romano, D.M., Wong, A.K.L.: Personality model of a social character. In: 18th British HCI Group Annual Conference (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Klıne, C., Blumberg, B.: The art and science of synthetic character design. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on AI and Creativity in Entertainment and Visual Art, AISB (1999)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Paiva, A., Dias, J., Sobral, D., Silva, C., Aylett, R.S., Woods, S., Zoll, C.: Caring for Agents and Agents that Care: Building Empathic Relations with Synthetic Agents. In: Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi Agent Systems, AAMAS 2004 (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Prada, R., Vala, M., Paiva, A., Hook, K., Bullock, A.: FantasyA - The Duel of Emotions. Short paper at Intelligent Virtual Agents (IVA), Kloster Irsee, Germany (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lankoski, P., Heliö, S., Ekman, I.: Characters in Computer Games: Toward Understanding Interpretation and Design. In: Proceedings of Level Up: Digital Games Research Conference (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Prada, R., Paiva, A.: Believable groups of synthetic characters. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS 2005), pp. 37–43 (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mosher, R., Magerko, B.: Personality Templates and Social Hierarchies Using Stereotypes. In: Göbel, S., Malkewitz, R., Iurgel, I. (eds.) TIDSE 2006. LNCS, vol. 4326, pp. 207–218. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tychsen, A., McIlwain, D., Brolund, T., Hitchens, M.: Player-Character Dynamics in Multi-Player Role Playing Games. In: Proceedings of DIGRA 2007, Tokyo, Japan (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Spence, J., Helmreich, R., Holahan, C.: The Personal Attributes Questionnaire: A measure of sex role stereotypes and masculinity-feminity. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology 4, 43–44 (1974)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rizzo, P.: Why Should Agents Be Emotional for Entertaining Users? A Critical Analysis. In: Paiva, A.C.R. (ed.) IWAI 1999. LNCS, vol. 1814, pp. 166–181. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ravaja, N., Saari, T., Salminen, M., Laarni, J., Holopainen, J., Järvinen, A.: Emotional response patterns and sense of presence during video games: Potential criterion variables for game design. In: Proceedings of NordCHI 2004, Tampere, Finland (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zuckerman, M., Kuhlman, M., Joiremann, J., Teta, P., Kraft, M.: A Comparison of Three Structural Models for Personality: The Big Three, The Big Five, and the Alternative Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65, 757–768 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kshirsagar, S., Thalmann, N.M.: Virtual Humans Personified. In: Proceedings of the first international joint conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi Agent Systems, AAMAS 2002 (2002)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Romano, D.M., Wong, A.K.L.: Personality Model of a Social Character. In: 18th British HCI Group Annual Conference, Leeds Metropolitan University, UK (2004)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ortony, A., Clore, G., Collins, A.: The Cognitive Structure of Emotions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1988)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bailey, C., Katchabaw, M.: An emergent framework for realistic psychosocial behaviour in non player characters. In: Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on Future Play: Research, Play, Share, Ontario, Canada (2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dugdale, J., El Jed, M., Pallamin, N., Pavard, B.: Modelling Character Emotion in an Interactive Virtual Environment. In: AISB Symposioum, Leeds, UK (2004)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sandercock, J., Padgham, L., Zambetta, F.: Creating Adaptive and Individual Personalities in Many Characters Without Hand-Crafting Behaviors. In: Gratch, J., Young, M., Aylett, R.S., Ballin, D., Olivier, P. (eds.) IVA 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4133, pp. 357–368. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Masuch, M., Hartmann, K., Schuster, G.: Emotional Agents for Interactive Environments. In: Proceedings of 4th Int. Conf. on Creating, Connecting and Collaborating through Computing, University of California, Berkeley (2006)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Murray, H.A.: Explorations in personality. Oxford University Press, New York (1938)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bostan, B.: Player Motivations: A Psychological Perspective. ACM Computers in Entertainment 7(2) (2009)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sweetser, P., Wyeth, P.: GameFlow: A model for evaluating player enjoyment in games. ACM Computers in Entertainment 3(3), 1–24 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Malone, T.W., Lepper, M.R.: Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. In: Snow, R.E., Farr, M.J. (eds.) Aptitude, Learning, and instruction: Conative and Affective Process Analyses. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1987)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yee, N.: Motivations of Play in Online Games. CyberPsychology & Behavior 9(6), 772–775 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bostan, B., Kaplancali, U.: Explorations in Player Motivations: Game Mechanics. In: Proceedings of GAMEON 2009, Düsseldorf, Germany (2009)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bostan, B., Kaplancali, U.: Explorations in Player Motivations: Game Mods. In: Proceedings of GAMEON-ASIA 2010, Shanghai, China (2010)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jackson, D.N.: Personality Research Form Manual. Research Psychologists Press, Port Huron (1989)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tychsen, A., Hitchens, M., Brolund, T., Kavakli, M.: The Game Master. In: Proceedings of the Interactive Entertainment Conference, Sydney, Australia, pp. 215–222 (2005)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Peinado, F., Gervas, P.: Transferring game mastering laws to interactive digital storytelling. In: Göbel, S., Spierling, U., Hoffmann, A., Iurgel, I., Schneider, O., Dechau, J., Feix, A. (eds.) TIDSE 2004. LNCS, vol. 3105, pp. 1–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Louchart, S., Aylett, R.: Towards a narrative theory of virtual reality. Virtual Reality 7(1), 2–9 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bosser, A., Levieux, G., Sehaba, K., Buendia, A., Corruble, V., Fondaumiere, G.D.: Dialogs taking into account experience, emotions and personality. In: DIMEA, pp. 9–12 (2007)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sehaba, K., Sabouret, N., Corruble, V.: An Emotional Model for Synthetic Characters with Personality. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international Conference on Affective Computing and intelligent interaction, Lisbon, Portugal (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barbaros Bostan
    • 1
  1. 1.Interactive and Digital Media Institute (IDMI)National University of Singapore 

Personalised recommendations