A Common-Sense Planning Strategy for Ambient Intelligence

  • María J. Santofimia
  • Scott E. Fahlman
  • Francisco Moya
  • Juan C. López
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6277)

Abstract

Systems for Ambient Intelligence contexts are expected to exhibit an autonomous and intelligent behavior, by understanding and reacting to the activities that take place in such contexts. These activities, specially those labeled as trivial or simple tasks, are carried out in an effortless manner by most people. In contrast to what it might be expected, computers have struggled to deal with these activities, while easily performing some others, such as high profile calculations, that are hard for humans. Imagine a situation where, while holding an object, the holder walks to a contiguous room. We effortlessly infer that the object is changing its location along with its holder. However, such inferences are not well addressed by computers due to their lack of common-sense knowledge and reasoning capability. Providing systems with these capabilities implies collecting a great deal of knowledge about everyday life and implementing inference mechanisms to derive new information from it. The work proposed here advocates a common-sense approach as a solution to the shortage of current systems for Ambient Intelligence.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ducatel, K., Bogdanowicz, M., Scapolo, F., Leijten, J., Burgelman, J.C.: ISTAG: Scenarios for ambient intelligence in 2010. Technical report, ISTAG (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wilensky, R.: Planning and Understanding. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1983)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Amigoni, F., Gatti, N., Pinciroli, C., Roveri, M.: What planner for Ambient Intelligence applications? IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A 35(1), 7–21 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Erol, K., Hendler, J., Nau, D.S.: HTN planning: Complexity and expressivity. In: AAAI 1994 (1994)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Villanueva, F.J., Villa, D., Santofimia, M.J., Moya, F., Lopez, J.C.: A framework for advanced home service design and management. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics 55(3), 1246–1254 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mueller, E.T.: Commonsense Reasoning. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hommel, B., Musseler, J., Aschersleben, G., Prinz, W.: The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24, 849–878 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bach, K.: Actions are not events. Mind 89, 114–120 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hyman, J.: Three fallacies about action. In: 29th International Wittgenstein Symposium (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Georgeff, M.P.: A theory of action for multiagent planning. In: Bond, A.H., Gasser, L. (eds.) Readings in Distributed Artificial Intelligence, pp. 205–209. Kaufmann, San Mateo (1988)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    W3C: OWL web ontology language home page (2009), http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/ (retrieved March 15, 2009)
  12. 12.
    W3C: Resource description framework (RDF) (2010), http://www.w3.org/RDF/ (retrieved February 28, 2010)
  13. 13.
    DiBernardo, M., Pottinger, R., Wilkinson, M.: Semi-automatic web service composition for the life sciences using the biomoby semantic web framework. J. of Biomedical Informatics 41(5), 837–847 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cycorp, I.: The Cyc project home page (2008), http://www.cyc.com (retrieved on December 10, 2008)
  15. 15.
    Fahlman, S.E.: The Scone knowledge-base project (2010), http://www.cs.cmu.edu/sef/scone/ (retrieved on February 28, 2010)
  16. 16.
    Davidson, D.: The Essential Davidson. Oxford University Press, USA (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chen, W., Fahlman, S.E.: Modeling mental contexts and their interactions. In: AAAI 2008 Fall Symposium on Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures, Washington (2008)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fahlman, S.E.: Marker-passing inference in the scone knowledge-base system. In: Lang, J., Lin, F., Wang, J. (eds.) KSEM 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4092, pp. 114–126. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wooldridge, M.J.: Reasoning about Rational Agents. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)MATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pokahr, A., Braubach, L., Lamersdorf, W.: Jadex: A BDI reasoning engine. In: Multi-Agent Programming, pp. 149–174. Springer Science+Business Media Inc., USA (September 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    ZeroC, I.: Ice home page (2008), http://www.zeroc.com/ (retrieved December 20, 2008)

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • María J. Santofimia
    • 1
  • Scott E. Fahlman
    • 2
  • Francisco Moya
    • 1
  • Juan C. López
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Architecture and Networks Group, School of Computer ScienceUniversity of Castilla-La Mancha 
  2. 2.Language Technologies InstituteCarnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations