Advertisement

Use of Geospatial Analyses for Semantic Reasoning

  • Ashish Karmacharya
  • Christophe Cruz
  • Frank Boochs
  • Franck Marzani
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6276)

Abstract

This work focuses on the integration of the spatial analyses for semantic reasoning in order to compute new axioms of an existing OWL ontology. To make it concrete, we have defined Spatial Built-ins, an extension of existing Built-ins of the SWRL rule language. It permits to run deductive rules with the help of a translation rule engine. Thus, the Spatial SWRL rules are translated to standard SWRL rules. Once the spatial functions of the Spatial SWRL rules are computed with the help of a spatial database system, the resulting translated rules are computed with a reasoning engine such as Racer, Jess or Pellet.

Keywords

Spatial Function Spatial Database Domain Ontology Open Geospatial Consortium Concept Feat 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    W3C, SWRL: A Semantic Web Rule Language Combining OWL and RuleML, http://www.w3.org/Submission/SWRL/ (Last Visited: November 25, 2008)
  2. 2.
    Pan, J.Z., Horrocks, I.: OWL-Eu: Adding Customised Datatypes into OWL. In: Gómez-Pérez, A., Euzenat, J. (eds.) ESWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3532, pp. 153–166. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Smith, M.J., Goodchild, M.J., Longley, P.A.: Geospatial Analysis: A Comprehensive guide to Principles. Techniques and Software Tools. Metador (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bechhofer, S., Harmelen, F.V., Hendler, J., Horrocks, I., McGuinness, D.L., Patel-Schneider, P.F., et al.: OWL Web Ontology Language. W3C Recommendation (2009), http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/ (Retrieved November 27, 2009)
  5. 5.
    Karmacharya, A., Cruz, C., Boochs, F., Marzani, F.: Support Of Spatial Analysis Through A Knowledgebase - A New Concept To Exploit Spatial Information Shown For Industrial Archaeology. In: The International 24th Cartographic Conference, Chili, November 16-21 (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Karmacharya, A., Cruz, C., Boochs, F., Marzani, F.: ArchaeoKM: toward a better archaeological spatial datasets management. In: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA), Williamsburg, Virginia, USA (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Karmacharya, A., Cruz, C., Boochs, F., Marzani, F.: Managing Knowledge for Spatial Data – A Case Study with Industrial Archaeological Findings. In: Digital Heritage in the New Knowledge Environment: Shared Spaces & Open Paths to Cultural Content, Athenes, Grece (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cruz, C., Nicolle, C.: Ontology Enrichment and Automatic Population From XML Data. In: 4th ODBIS Workshop on Ontologies-based Techniques for DataBases in Information Systems and Knowledge Systems, Co-located with VLDB, August 23 (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Boley, H.: The Rule Markup Initiative, http://ruleml.org/ (Last Visited February 11, 2010)
  10. 10.
    Lieberman, J., Singh, R., Goad, C.: W3C Geospatial Ontologies – W3C Incubator Group Report. W3C (2009), http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/geo/XGR-geo-ont-20071023/
  11. 11.
    PostgreSQL, PostGIS Manual, PostgreSQL documentation (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wüst, T., Nebiker, S., Landolt, R.: Applying the 3D GIS DILAS to Archaeology and Cultural Heritage Projects-Requirements and First Results. Basel University of Applied Sciences, Muttenz, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cosmas, J., Itagaki, T., Green, D., Grabczewski, E., Waelkens, M., Degeest, R., et al.: 3D MURALE:A Multimedia System for Archaeology. In: Proc. ACM Virtual Reality, Archaeology and Cultural Heritage (VAST 2001) (November 2001)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Semantic Interoperability Community of Practice (SICoP), Introducing Semantic Technologies and the Vision of the Semantic Web (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Roman, D., Klien, E., Skogan, D.: SWING – A Semantic Web Services Framework for the Geospatial Domain. In: Position Paper at the Terra Cognita 2006 - Directions to the Geospatial Semantic Web Workshop, Athens, USA (2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cruz, I.F.: Geospatial Data Integration, ADVIS Lab, Department of Computer Science, University of Illinois, Chicago (2004)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chaudhary, A., Sunna, W., Cruz, I.F.: Semi-automatic Ontology Alignment for Geospatial Data Integration. In: Egenhofer, M.J., Freksa, C., Miller, H.J. (eds.) GIScience 2004. LNCS, vol. 3234, pp. 51–66. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tanasescu, V., Gugliotta, A., Domingue, J., Gutiérrez Villarías, L., Davies, R., Rowlatt, M., Richardson, M., Stinčić, S.: A Semantic Web Services GIS based Emergency Management Application. In: Cruz, I., Decker, S., Allemang, D., Preist, C., Schwabe, D., Mika, P., Uschold, M., Aroyo, L.M. (eds.) ISWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4273, pp. 959–966. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lieberman, J., Singh, R., Goad, C.: W3C Geospatial Ontologies – W3C Incubator Group Report. W3C, http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/geo/XGR-geo-ont-20071023/ (Last visited, June 23 2009)

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ashish Karmacharya
    • 1
    • 2
  • Christophe Cruz
    • 2
  • Frank Boochs
    • 1
  • Franck Marzani
    • 2
  1. 1.Institut i3mainz, am Fachbereich 1 - Geoinformatik und VermessungFachhochschule MainzMainz
  2. 2.Laboratoire Le2i, UMR-5158 CNRS, UFR Sciences et TechniquesUniversité de BourgogneDijon CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations